Skip to main content
A-LevelPsychologyResearch methods9990/23 · May/June 2021 · Q78 Marks

Jane is planning a laboratory experiment with two groups of participants. One group speaks one language fluently and the other group speaks two or more languages fluently. Jane thinks this may affect her dependent variable of how well they learn ‘nonsense' words. These are words that read like real words but have no meaning.

  1. (a)(i)Explain one strength of one of Jane's measures of her dependent variable.[2]
  2. (a)(ii)Explain one weakness of the measure of the dependent variable that you have referred to in (a)(i).[2]
  3. (b)Suggest one way that Jane can operationalise 'speaking a language fluently'.[2]
  4. (c)Jane used an independent measures design in her experiment. Explain one reason why it would have been better for Jane to use a matched pairs design than an independent measures design.[2]

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2021). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] 1 mark for justification of candidate's choice of measure (no mark for just choosing one of the measures)
  2. [1] 1 mark for link / context
  3. [1] Timing / number of spelling errors is objective/valid/quantitative; (strength)
  4. [1] i.e. comparisons of speed of response to / errors in nonsense words between one and two-language groups; (link)
  5. [1] Timing / counting errors is objective; (strength)
  6. [1] So Jane can't make be biased in her judgments (of time); (link)
  7. [1] Jane so she must be testing what she claimed to;
  8. [1] Because they've not learned the words if they can't spell them; (link)
  9. [1] 1 mark for a brief muddled weakness
  10. [2] 2 marks for a clear/detailed weakness
  11. [1] how quickly the participant can respond:
  12. [1] timing may not be valid as a measure because people learn words at different speeds;
  13. [1] so the times would depend on individual differences / participant variables not number of languages spoken;
  14. [1] number of spelling errors:
  15. [1] number of errors may not be valid as a measure because people differ in spelling ability anyway;
  16. [1] so the errors would depend on individual differences / participant variables not number of languages spoken;
  17. [1] 1 mark for a brief muddled operationalisation
  18. [2] 2 marks for a clear/detailed operationalisation
  19. [2] Speaking easily and without many pauses = 2
  20. [1] Being able to understand = 1
  21. [2] Being able to understand well enough to deal with a native speaker in conversation = 2
  22. [1] Coping with everyday life in that language = 1
  23. [2] Coping with everyday life in that language, such as being able to buy food / work / study / understand a film = 2
  24. [1] Having a qualification = 1
  25. [1] e.g. British Council Certificate / IGCSE English
  26. [1] 1 mark for reason (comparison may be explicit or implicit)
  27. [1] 1 mark for link (e.g. variable relevant to ability to learn/recall words or speed of response)
  28. [1] Matched pairs designs reduce/eliminate participant variables; (reason)
  29. [1] In Jane's experiment these might be reaction time / age / intelligence (which could affect ability to learn nonsense words / respond quickly/accurately to questions); (link)

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
Research methods, A-Level Psychology (syllabus 9990). Structured question, 8 marks.
Source
A-Level Psychology, May/June 2021 Paper 2 Variant 3, question 7.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Psychology questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep