Kira is conducting a correlational study looking for a relationship between level of creativity and the amount of time spent playing sport. Kira could find a positive or a negative correlation.
- (a)State whether Kira should use a directional or a non-directional hypothesis. Include a reason for your answer.[1]
- (b)State what Kira would find if there was a negative correlation.[1]
- (c)Write a null hypothesis for Kira's study.[1]
- (d)Kira finds a strong correlation. Explain whether Kira will know if one variable is causing the change in the other variable.[2]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2021). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] 1 mark for explanation of why it should be non-directional
- (no marks for just stating non-directional)
- non-directional because she does not know whether there will be a positive or a negative correlation;
- [1] 1 mark for explanation
- As the amount of creativity went up, the amount of time spent playing sport would go down; ORA
- [1] 1 mark for a correlational null hypothesis
- It must include both variables. Hypothesis does not have to be operationalised.
- There will be no correlation/link/relationship between time spent playing sport and (level of) creativity;
- Any correlation/link/relationship between time spent playing sport and (level of) creativity is due to chance;
- [2] 1 mark for explaining why not (no marks for just 'no')
- 1 mark for link
- No, because a correlation cannot demonstrate a causal relationship; (generic why)
- So creativity could cause people to play more sport or playing more sport could reduce creativity; (link)
- No, because a third factor could cause the change in both variables; (generic why)
- e.g. schooling could cause both an increase in creativity and less time spent playing sport; (link)
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →