Students in Gaborone, the capital city of Botswana, were studying land-use in urban areas. They did fieldwork to examine differences between land-use in the CBD (Central Business District) and other parts of the city. They wanted to test the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: The height of buildings decreases as distance from the CBD increases. Hypothesis 2: The land-use in the CBD is different from that in the rest of the city. To collect data the students were divided into four groups. Each group followed a different transect from the city centre outwards. The transect routes went north, east, south and west of the CBD.
- (a)(i)At selected distances along each transect the students counted the number of storeys of six different buildings. They then calculated the average number of storeys. Their results are shown in Table 4 (Insert). Suggest why the four groups got different results in the CBD.[2]
- (a)(ii)The students plotted their results on the diagram shown in Fig. 14 below. Use the data in Table 4 to complete the results of the West and North transects in Fig. 14.[2]
- (a)(iii)To what extent is Hypothesis 1: The height of buildings decreases as distance from the CBD increases true? Explain your answer with data from Table 4 and Fig. 14.[4]
- (a)(iv)Explain why building height varies in different areas of a city.[2]
- (b)(i)To investigate Hypothesis 2: The land-use in the CBD is different from that in the rest of the city, the students recorded the ground floor land-use of buildings in the CBD and along the four transect lines. One group's land-use map of part of the CBD is shown in Fig. 15 below. Use the key to shade in the Hungry Lion restaurant and the President Hotel in Fig. 15 above.[2]
- (b)(ii)How many offices are shown in the map shown in Fig. 15?[1]
- (b)(iii)Suggest why the students only recorded the ground floor land-use of buildings.[1]
- (b)(iv)In order to compare the different areas of the city the students calculated percentage figures of different types of land-use. These results are shown in Table 5 (Insert). Use the data in Table 5 to complete the pie chart for the CBD in Fig. 16 below.[3]
- (b)(v)Describe one major difference in land-use between each of the following pairs of transects shown on Fig. 16. north transect and south transect .......................................................................... east transect and west transect ...........................................................................[2]
- (b)(vi)What conclusion would the students come to about Hypothesis 2: The land-use in the CBD is different from that in the rest of the city? Use evidence from Table 5 and Fig. 16 to support your decision.[4]
- (c)Why does land-use vary in different parts of a city?[4]
- (d)When the students returned to school they discussed with their teacher how they could improve their data collection methods. Suggest three improvements they could have made. 1 2 3[3]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2014). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [2] (a) (i) Groups sampled buildings in different areas of CBD / looked at different buildings / went in different directions
- Buildings in CBD vary in number of storeys / vary in height
- Land use varies in CBD / offices have taller buildings / shops have less storeys than offices
- Age of buildings vary / some are newer than others
- [2] (ii) Complete bars – 2.0 storeys at 2km on West transect and 2.7 storeys at 1 km on North transect
- 2 @ 1
- [4] (iii) Generally / partially / to some extent / mainly / not completely – 1 mark reserve (✓HA)
- True for North / West transect / average height does reduce at each distance from CBD
- Statistics to support: North from 7.5 or 2.7 down to 1.0 / West from 8.2 or 2.3 down to 1.0
- Not true for South / East transect / anomaly / height does not reduce at each distance from CBD
- Statistics to support: South from 1.2 at 3km to 1.8 at 4km / East from 1.7 at 1km to 5.9 at 2km
- Hypothesis conclusion is incorrect / false / correct / true = 0 (XHa)
- If no hypothesis conclusion ^HA and credit evidence
- [2] (iv) Value of land increases where there is limited amount
- Higher value land / higher price land / higher cost of land requires higher buildings
- Limited amount of land / higher land price / competition for space means buildings must grow upwards OR more space so buildings are lower
- Different land uses / examples of two land uses
- NOT: amount of space / accessibility / transport
- [2] (b) (i) Shading Hungry Lion as commercial and President Hotel as services
- 2 @ 1
- [1] (ii) 12
- [1] (iii) Ground floor is easiest to see / record land use / easier work
- Cannot see what upper storeys are used for / unable to enter building
- Takes too long to record use of all storeys / save time / quicker
- NOT: too much work / too much trouble / cannot be bothered / multiple uses / most variety of land use on ground floor / upper floors are mainly offices / ground floor is used most frequently
- [3] (iv) Completion of CBD pie chart – residential = 2, commercial = 63,
- Offices = 25, services =10%
- 2 marks for correct position of dividing lines – 2, 65, 90 (minus 1 mark for each error in position of dividing lines)
- 1 mark for shading
- If lines are wrong way round this only counts as one error and candidate can still score 2 marks if all segments are correct size and shading is correct
- [2] (v) North transect has higher percentage of residential / more residential
- lower percentage of commercial / less commercial
- lower percentage of industry / less industry
- NO credit for services or offices
- East transect has lower percentage of residential / less residential
- higher percentage of commercial / more commercial
- higher percentage of offices / West has no offices but East does
- higher percentage of services / West has no services but East does
- no industry unlike West
- Mainly residential in West and mainly commercial in East
- No credit for statistics, must be interpretation
- 2 @ 1
- [4] (vi) Hypothesis is true / partly true / generally true – 1 mark reserve (✓HA)
- Need comparison with other areas OR 2 comparative stats (1 must be CBD)
- Commercial - largest percentage / most in CBD OR commercial = 63% in CBD and 7% in North
- Offices - largest percentage / most in CBD OR stats
- Residential - smallest percentage / least in CBD OR stats
- Industry - none in CBD but located in three of transects / less in CBD than East or South or West transect OR stats
- Services - less in CBD than East / more in CBD than North or South or West OR stats
- Hypothesis conclusion is incorrect / false = 0 (XHa)
- If no hypothesis conclusion ^HA & credit evidence
- [4] (c) Factors such as:
- Growth of city spatially
- Development of city over time
- Transport links – road / rail / air / river / accessibility
- Competition for land / bid rent
- Cost of land / cheaper out of city
- Availability of land / amount of space
- Relief / flood plain
- Wind direction
- Planning policy
- Close to raw material for industry / mining subsidence
- [3] (d) Bigger sample size than 6 buildings for number of storeys
- More transects to cover larger area of city
- More data collection points than 4 along each transect
- Extend transect further out
- Only collect one set of building heights in CBD
- Record land use in upper storeys
- Have more than 5 land use categories
- Do a pilot survey
- Check where there is an anomaly
- Answer must relate to work done not possible new work
- NOT: count storey twice / tally / use clicker / different days / more people measure same thing / do in another city / repeat fieldwork
- 3 @ 1
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →