From the study by Baron-Cohen et al. (eyes test):
- (a)Identify two characteristics of the sample used in Group 1.[2]
- (b)Describe how the participants were recruited for Group 1.[3]
- (c)Outline one conclusion from this study.[2]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (Feb/Mar 2020). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- One mark per characteristic. If more than two given take the first two answers.
- Adults/average age of 29.7 years;
- Diagnosed with AS/HFA;
- Male;
- Average IQ of 115.
- One mark per correct point
- Via volunteer/self-selecting sampling;
- Advertisements were placed in UK National Autistic Society magazine;
- All (potential) participants had been diagnosed with AS/HFA;
- Using established criteria (DSM/ICD);
- They had to be in an equivalent range of socioeconomic class/education as Group 2.
- Two marks for full conclusion
- One mark for partial conclusion
- 0 marks for purely results
- e.g.
- The Revised ‘Eyes Test' overcame the problems of the original version (1);
- The Revised 'Eyes Test' overcame the problems of the original version making it a valid test of social intelligence (in adults) (2);
- The Revised test could discriminate AS and non-AS participants (1);
- People with autism have difficulties with Theory of Mind (1);
- People with autism have difficulties with Theory of Mind as they cannot see the perspective of other people (2);
- Males are more likely to be autistic/females less likely to be autistic (1);
- Participants with AS/HFA scored lower on the Eyes Test than all other groups (0);
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →