One part of the investigation by Dement and Kleitman (sleep and dreams) involved a correlational study measuring a range of times spent in REM sleep and the number of words in the participant's dream narrative.
- (a)Explain why this part of the investigation was a correlational study rather than an experiment.[1]
- (b)Explain one disadvantage of using a correlation in this study.[2]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2020). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] 1 mark for explanation (generic or linked) Because they were looking for the relationship between two variables = 1 Because they were looking for the relationship between time spent in REM and length of the narrative = 1
- [2] 1 mark for disadvantage 1 mark for link correlations cannot find causal relationships = 1 (disadvantage) so they couldn't tell if REM sleep caused dreams / e.g. between REM and dreaming = 1 (link) the correlation was difficult to see = 1 (disadvantage) because there were only a few long REM phases = 1 (link) a correlation that was found may have been flawed = 1 (disadvantage) because the number of words in the dream narrative could depend on expressiveness = 1 (link)
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →