Cecile has ten parrots that can answer questions about shapes. She is interested in whether there is a difference between the ability of parrots to learn to answer questions about sounds, such as from bells or buzzers, compared to shapes.
- (a)Describe how Cecile could conduct a laboratory experiment to test whether there is a difference in the ability of parrots to learn to answer questions about sounds compared to shapes.[10]
- (b)Identify one practical weakness/limitation with the procedure you have described in your answer to part (a) and suggest how your study might be done differently to overcome the problem. Do not refer to ethics or sampling in your answer.[4]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2019). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- Three major omissions for a laboratory experiment are:
- What - will be recorded, i.e. DV (ability of parrots to answer questions)
- How - IV (sounds & shapes)
- controls
- The minor omissions are:
- where - location of participants when data is collected (i.e. lab)
- who - participants (parrots)
- Indicative content for a laboratory experiment:
- How - identification of the independent variable (sounds and shapes)
- How operationalisation of the dependent variable (ability of parrots to answer questions)
- What - identification of the dependent variable
- operationalisation of the dependent variable
- including examples of ways to measure the variable
- How - controls
- experimental design (any are appropriate here)
- sampling technique
- sample size (10)
- description of how data will analysed, e.g. use of measures of central tendency and spread, bar charts
- ethical issues
- Level 3 (8-10 marks)
- Response is described in sufficient detail to be replicable.
- Response may have a minor omission.
- Use of psychological terminology is accurate and comprehensive.
- Level 2 (5-7 marks)
- Response is in some detail.
- Response has minor omission(s).
- Use of psychological terminology is accurate.
- Level 1 (1-4 marks)
- Response is basic in detail.
- Response has major omission(s).
- If response is impossible to conduct max. 2.
- Use of psychological terminology is mainly accurate.
- Level 0 (0 marks)
- No response worthy of credit.
- [4] Identify one practical weakness/limitation with the procedure you have described in your answer to part (a) and suggest how your study might be done differently to overcome the problem.
- Do not refer to ethics or sampling in your answer.
- Answer will depend on problem identified.
- Problems may, for example, be matters of:
- Validity
- operationalisation e.g. deciding if learning has occurred
- parrot factors e.g. auditory range, choices of reinforcers, parrot imitating sound rather than learning the task
- Reliability
- inter-rater consistency (re decision about whether parrot's response is 'correct')
- intra-rater consistency.
- This list is not exhaustive and other appropriate responses should also be credited.
- Level
- Marks
- Comment
- 3
- 3-4
- Appropriate problem identified.
- Appropriate solution is clearly described.
- 2
- 2
- Appropriate problem identified.
- plus
- EITHER
- Explanation of why it is a problem
- OR
- Ineffectual but possible solution described.
- 1
- 1
- Appropriate problem identified.
- Little or no justification.
- 0
- 0
- No response worthy of credit
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →