Skip to main content
O-LevelGeographyThe natural environment2217/22 · Oct/Nov 2019 · Q830 Marks

Students carried out fieldwork at a popular tourist beach in south east England. The cliffs behind the beach are being eroded by the sea, especially where they are unprotected. The area is shown in Fig. 8.1 (Insert). The students tested the following hypotheses through fieldwork at two areas of the coast shown in Fig. 8.1: Hypothesis 1: The beach profile is steeper than the wave-cut platform profile. Hypothesis 2: Infiltration is faster on the beach than on the wave-cut platform.

  1. (a)(i)Before they began their fieldwork, the students assessed the possible hazards they may come across and how to manage them. Their decisions are shown in Table 8.1 below. Which one of the possible hazards did the students think was the greatest risk?[1]
  2. (a)(ii)Suggest different ways to reduce the risk of each of the following hazards during fieldwork: Cliff collapse Hypothermia from getting cold and wet Getting lost or isolated[3]
  3. (b)(i)The cliffs at X shown in Fig. 8.1 are being eroded by the sea at a rate of two metres per year. Use arrows to match the processes of sea erosion with the correct definitions in the table below. One has been completed for you.[2]
  4. (b)(ii)Explain why erosion is taking place at X but not at Y (shown in Fig. 8.1).[3]
  5. (c)(i)To investigate Hypothesis 1, the students measured the profile of the beach and the profile of the wave-cut platform. Fig. 8.2 (Insert) shows a student doing this task. Describe how the students would measure the profile.[4]
  6. (c)(ii)The students used the results to draw the two profiles shown in Fig. 8.3 (Insert). What conclusion would the students make about Hypothesis 1: The beach profile is steeper than the wave-cut platform profile? Use evidence from Fig. 8.3 to support your decision.[3]
  7. (d)(i)To investigate Hypothesis 2: Infiltration is faster on the beach than on the wave-cut platform, the students measured the rate at which water infiltrated (soaked into) the ground. Their method is described in Fig. 8.4 (Insert). The students made their measurements at four points (A–D) along each profile from the sea to the cliff. To make their results reliable they measured infiltration three times at each point. Their results are shown in Table 8.2 (Insert). On Fig. 8.5 below plot the results of measurement 3 at points A and B along the beach profile.[2]
  8. (d)(ii)What conclusion would the students make about Hypothesis 2: Infiltration is faster on the beach than on the wave-cut platform? Tick your decision below Conclusion Tick (✔) Hypothesis 2 is correct Hypothesis 2 is partially correct Hypothesis 2 is incorrect[1]
  9. (d)(iii)Use evidence from Fig. 8.5 and Table 8.2 to support your conclusion to (d)(ii).[2]
  10. (d)(iv)Which one of the following pairs correctly explains the difference between the infiltration times on the beach and the wave-cut platform? Look at Fig. 8.1 (Insert) to help you to answer. Groynes prevent longshore drift so sand and shingle build up a beach which water infiltrates through quickly. The wave-cut platform made of clay is at the surface due to the removal of beach material, and water infiltrates slowly. The beach material is clay which slows water infiltration through the wave-cut platform. The sand and shingle beach material forms a steep slope which increases infiltration. The wave-cut platform is uncovered and water quickly infiltrates into the ground. The beach builds up behind groynes and prevents infiltration.[1]
  11. (e)(i)The students wanted to find out what people thought about coastal protection in the area. They produced a questionnaire which is shown in Fig. 8.6 (Insert). The results of the questionnaire are shown in Table 8.3 (Insert). Use the results of Question 4 to complete the divided bar graph in Fig. 8.7 below.[2]
  12. (e)(ii)Use the results of Question 5 to complete the pie graph in Fig. 8.8 below.[2]
  13. (e)(iii)Write a report about coastal protection based on what the students found out from their questionnaire. Refer to the results in Table 8.3 but do not copy them out.[4]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2019). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] Hypothermia (from getting cold and wet) (1)
  2. [3] Cliff collapse Stay away from the base/top of the cliffs/wear a hard hat (1) Hypothermia from getting cold and wet Wear warm/waterproof clothes/layers of clothes (1) Getting lost or isolated Stay in groups/carry a cell (mobile) phone (1) (1 + 1 + 1)
  3. [2] Attrition Particles carried by the waves crash against each other and are broken up Corrasion (abrasion) Particles carried by the waves are thrown at the cliffs and erode them Hydraulic action Waves trap and compress air in cracks in the cliff which causes the rocks to break apart Solution (corrosion) Acids in the seawater dissolve chalk and limestone cliffs (1+1)
  4. [3] Y is protected by beach/X is exposed to the waves (1); Groynes help to protect cliffs through build-up of beach deposits/Y is protected by sea wall (1); Wave-cut platform do not stop waves reaching the cliff (1) (1 + 1 + 1)
  5. [4] Equipment mark from photograph: Ranging pole/clinometer (1 mark maximum/reserve) for stating one of these. Measuring the profile Lay tape measure on beach to create a transect (1) Poles put at break of slope/at equal distances apart (1) Poles must be vertical (1) Poles rest on surface/to equal depth in sand (1) Angle is read from lower pole (nearer to sea) to upper pole (further from sea) (1) Student holds clinometer at top/at marked height on ranging pole (1) Allow clinometer to adjust to angle (1) Read/measure angle/degrees (1) Credit description even if it is not shown on Fig. 2.2.max. (1R + 1 + 1 + 1)
  6. [3] Hypothesis is true – 1 mark reserve (HA) Evidence must be based on data Beach increases 2–2.2 m/just over 2 m in 19 m (1) Wave-cut platform increases 0.9/just less than 1 m in 24 m (1) Hypothesis is incorrect/partially correct = 0 (XHA) If no hypothesis conclusion ^HA and credit evidence (1HA + 1 + 1)
  7. [2] Plotting above 3 results on Beach graph (58 and 85 mm) (1 + 1)
  8. [1] Hypothesis 2 is correct (1)
  9. [2] Water level decreases more quickly on beach (1) Comparison of paired data e.g. decreases by max. amount of 120 mm on beach & only 12 mm max. on wave-cut platform (1) (1+1)
  10. [1] The wave-cut platform made of clay is at the surface due to the removal of beach material, and water infiltrates slowly.
  11. [2] Completion of divided bar graph (rip rap = 13%, sea wall = 29%) Dividing line = 1 mark, shading = 1 mark (1 + 1)
  12. [2] Completion of pie graph (residents = 11%, visitors = 19%) Dividing line at 71% from left = 1 mark Shading in correct order/style using key = 1 mark (1+1)
  13. [4] Looking for 4 conclusions from 5 questions. No credit for use of data. Results show: Most/majority of people are aware that the cliffs are being eroded (1) Most/majority of people think the cliffs should be protected (1) Most/majority of people are in favour of spending the money (1) Groynes are the most popular protection method (1) NOT majority. Most/majority of people think that the national government should pay for the protection work (1) (1 + 1 + 1 + 1)

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
The natural environment, O-Level Geography (syllabus 2217). Structured question, 30 marks.
Source
O-Level Geography, Oct/Nov 2019 Paper 2 Variant 2, question 8.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Geography questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep