Skip to main content
O-LevelGeographyEconomic development2217/13 · Oct/Nov 2018 · Q625 Marks

(a) Study Fig. 6.1, which is a graph showing information about the employment structure of Sweden (an MEDC) and Myanmar (an LEDC). [Figure 6.1]

  1. (a)(i)Plot a cross on Fig. 6.1 to show the following information about the employment structure of Ghana: Primary 45% Secondary 15% Tertiary 40%[1]
  2. (a)(ii)Give one example of primary employment and one example of tertiary employment.[2]
  3. (a)(iii)Using information from Fig. 6.1 only, compare the employment structure of Sweden and Myanmar.[3]
  4. (a)(iv)Suggest reasons for the difference in employment structure between Sweden and Myanmar.[4]
  5. (b)Study Fig. 6.2 (Insert), which shows information about the car assembly industry.
  6. (b)(i)Use Fig. 6.2 to explain what is meant by assembly industry.[3]
  7. (b)(ii)Explain how the location of industry can be influenced by transport.[5]
  8. (c)Describe the local and global environmental risks of an economic activity which takes place in a named area you have studied. Name of area .............................................. Economic activity ..............................................[7]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2018). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] Plot on graph
  2. [2] Primary = farming/fishing/mining etc.; Tertiary = teaching/banking/working in an office/driver/doctor etc.; 2 @ 1 mark
  3. [3] Sweden has: More tertiary; Less primary; more secondary; Main employment in Sweden is tertiary but in Myanmar it is primary (Or could refer to Myanmar but answer must be comparative); 3 @ 1 mark
  4. [4] Ideas such as: More mechanization/technology in Sweden; Many (subsistence) farmers in Myanmar; More Industrialization/building of factories in Sweden/few factories in Myanmar/more TNCs in Sweden; Exhaustion/lack of natural resources in Sweden/more natural resources to exploit in Myanmar; Better skills/education in Sweden; People can afford more services/examples in Sweden; Sweden can import more; More tourism in Sweden; etc.; 4 @ 1 mark
  5. [3] Use components/different/premade parts; Produced by different factories/suppliers; These are put together; 3 @ 1 mark
  6. [5] Ideas such as: Near roads; Near railways/railway stations; Near ports/harbours/rivers/canals; Near airports; To transport raw materials/inputs/imports; To transport finished goods/outputs/exports; To reduce costs; To increase speed; Especially bulky materials(dev); Especially perishable goods (dev); 5 @ 1 mark or development
  7. [7] Content Guide: Reference can be made to any economic activity at any scale, such as: Agriculture; Manufacturing; Tourism; Forestry; Mining; Fishing; Power generation etc. Depending on the choice of economic activity impacts may include: Soil erosion; Loss of vegetation; Destruction of habitats; Loss of food chains; Water pollution; Air pollution; Death of wildlife; Global warming; Acid rain etc.; Place specific reference is likely to consist of: Locational details of economic activity; Names of place within chosen area; Specific details of/data on impacts on species etc.

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
Economic development, O-Level Geography (syllabus 2217). Structured question, 25 marks.
Source
O-Level Geography, Oct/Nov 2018 Paper 1 Variant 3, question 6.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Geography questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep