Skip to main content
O-LevelGeographyThe natural environment2217/23 · May/June 2010 · Q830 Marks

Some students wanted to investigate the flow of a river on a meander. Before they began their fieldwork their teacher spoke to them about safety when planning their fieldwork. The students decided to investigate two hypotheses about the speed of flow (velocity) of the water in the river: Hypothesis 1: Velocity on the surface varies across a river meander. Hypothesis 2: Velocity is greater on the surface and decreases as the depth of the channel increases.

  1. (a)Suggest three pieces of advice their teacher gave them to keep them safe.[3]
  2. (b)(i)To investigate Hypothesis 1, the students made some measurements on the meander. Describe how the students measured velocity on the surface using an orange as a float, a tape measure and a stopwatch.[3]
  3. (b)(ii)How did the students measure the depth of the river? Refer to the equipment they would have used.[3]
  4. (b)(iii)The results of their measurements are shown in Table 7. Fig. 13 is a sketch of the meander bend to show sample points. Table 7 Sample point Velocity on the surface (cm per second) Depth of channel (metres) 1 18 0.35 2 41 0.62 3 72 0.75 Sketch of meander bend to show sample points [Figure 13] The students agreed with Hypothesis 1: Velocity on the surface varies across a river meander. Use evidence from Table 7 to suggest how they reached their conclusion.[2]
  5. (c)When the students got back to school they described to their teacher how they had carried out their investigation to measure surface velocity. Their teacher then suggested some weaknesses in their method. Give three weaknesses that might have been suggested.[3]
  6. (d)(i)Taking the advice from their teacher the students went to another meander on the river in order to improve their measuring procedures. First they used a flowmeter to measure the velocity. This is shown in Photograph B and Fig. 14 (Insert). Suggest how they used this equipment.[3]
  7. (d)(ii)Using their results obtained with the flowmeter, the students were able to plot velocity more accurately. Their results are shown in Fig. 15 below. Sketch of the meander to show velocity at different points [Figure 15] On Fig. 15 complete the 20cm per second isoline.[2]
  8. (d)(iii)On Fig.15, shade in the part of the river where the current is greater than 40 cm per second.[1]
  9. (d)(iv)Use the information on Fig. 15 to decide whether you agree with Hypothesis 2: Velocity is greater on the surface and decreases as the depth of the channel increases. Support your conclusion with figures from Fig. 15.[4]
  10. (d)(v)Explain why the velocity of the river on the meander varies as shown in Fig. 15.[2]
  11. (e)In order to extend their fieldwork the students decided to compare their results from the meander with a straight section of river 100 metres further downstream. Suggest what similarities and differences the students would find between the velocity in the two sections of river. You may draw a diagram as part of your answer.[4]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2010). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [3 @ 1 = 3] (a) Don't do fieldwork/check conditions if river is in flood/deep/fast-flowing Wear strong shoes/wellingtons to protect feet Don't do fieldwork alone – at least two preferably three people/group Wear waterproofs to keep warm/protective clothing/light clothes which will dry Keep a look out for dangerous animals Don't do fieldwork if river is badly polluted/don't drink water/Veil's disease Tell someone where you are going/take a mobile phone for emergency Complete in daylight/before it gets dark May be slippery rocks/bank NOT don't run around/push each other in/swim in river
  2. [3] (b) (i) Measure section along river Time floats over measured section Repeat timing exercise at points 1, 2 and 3 across river Calculate surface velocity: distance time
  3. [3] (b) (ii) Rest rule/ruler on river bed - NOT ‘in river' Ensure rule is upright/vertical Take reading of water surface on rule/measure part of stick which is wet May suggest string & weigh & tape measure Lower string to river bed Mark / observe water level on string Measure wet section NOT repetition of measuring across river No credit for equipment – must describe its use
  4. [2] (b) (iii) Velocity is greater near the outer bank of the meander/sample point 3 Velocity decreases towards the inner bank/sample point 1 Alternative to above ideas: velocity varies at different points/there are variations in velocity across river/velocity increases from sample point 1 to point 3 – NOT wording of hypothesis Velocity is greater where river is deeper/least where river is shallow Credit 1 mark (not reserve) for two comparative figures from 18, 41, 72 or difference between them No hypothesis mark
  5. [3 @ 1 = 3] (c) Only measuring surface velocity Measurements could be affected by external influences such as floats get stuck on vegetation strong wind may interfere with movement of float Route taken by floats is unpredictable Floats all move into main current of river, so not really testing velocity across a meander Too few sampling points Only taking one measurement at each sampling point/need to do more Random positioning of sample points/not equal distances apart NOT human error weaknesses such as inaccurate timing/distance measurement
  6. [3] (d) (i) Put flow meter on the bed of river/into river Must be held vertically Stand downstream or to the side of the flowmeter Propeller must be facing upstream Propeller spins/moves Record digital reading/display shows velocity Take several readings and calculate average NOT take measurements at different points in river
  7. [2] (d) (ii) Completion of 20cm per second isoline Minus 1 mark for each error
  8. [1] (d) (iii) Shading on diagram the area where velocity is greater than 40cm per second
  9. [4] (d) (iv) Agree/partly agree with hypothesis – reserve mark Supporting data – two current measurements: e.g. 40-37-19 cm per second But where current is strongest there is exception/hypothesis doesn't apply everywhere across meander Here the greatest velocity is at about 1/3 of depth/just under water surface Supporting data – two current measurements: e.g. 60-68-70 cm per second Then velocity does decrease below 1/3 of depth Allow two marks for comparative figures (not reserve)
  10. [2] (d) (v) Surface velocity is affected by friction with atmosphere Velocity near bed/banks of channel reduced by friction with channel Greatest velocity is where current is strongest/river is deeper/has most energy NOT 'velocity is greater on outside'
  11. [4] (e) Similarities: Greater velocity slightly beneath surface/at surface Greater velocity where river is deeper Velocity reduces near bed/banks Differences: Velocity faster in middle of channel on a straight section Velocity decreases more evenly towards bed/banks on straight section 1 mark reserve for similarity/difference

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
The natural environment, O-Level Geography (syllabus 2217). Structured question, 30 marks.
Source
O-Level Geography, May/June 2010 Paper 2 Variant 3, question 8.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Geography questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep