Fig. 2.1 shows the development of a tourist resort in the UK between 1800 and 2000. [Figure 2.1]
- (a)(i)How many tourists visited the resort at its peak in 1955? million[1]
- (a)(ii)For how many years did the number of tourists to the resort decrease? years[1]
- (b)Using Fig. 2.1, identify four factors that helped explain the rise in the number of tourists. 1 2 3 4[2]
- (c)Using Fig. 2.1, suggest why the following factors resulted in fewer tourists visiting the resort. growth of package holidays resort now run down[4]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2025). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] (a)(i) 17.5 million (allow 17.3–17.7 million)
- [1] (a)(ii) 45 years
- [2] (b) presence of beach/sea bathing; workers given annual holidays; workers given holidays with pay; the arrival/building of the railway; the opening of/advertising of new attractions/the pier/tower/theme park (max 2). 3 or 4 correct = 2 marks, 1 or 2 correct = 1 mark
- [4] (c) Growth of package holidays (Reserve 1 mark): more people could afford to travel to other destinations/more disposable income; cheap(er) to go abroad (than holiday in the UK)/cheap(er)/cheap(er) airlines/airfares; Need to know what is cheap(er); attraction of places they had not been to before/new market/experience something new/different/want to go somewhere more exotic; people could now access places with a warmer/tropical climate (than the UK); booking package holidays was a lot easier (via travel agencies); package holidays offered more activities than the resort; more leisure time so could stay away for longer. Area now run down (Reserve 1 mark): resort loses its appeal/unattractive to many tourists/area/resort lost its popularity/dated/old fashioned/neglected; vandalism/graffiti/facilities damaged/closed; noise pollution/many tourists looking for somewhere calmer/more peaceful; less money coming in to spend on it; resort had no new facilities/innovations; its popularity for parties for the younger generation put off older people/families/give resort a bad reputation. Note: no double credit. Marks must be credited in the correct section.
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →