Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans) used four different model conditions. One of these was 'Critical area – early'.
- (a)Outline what the model was expected to do in this condition.[2]
- (b)Describe one quantitative result of the behaviour of participants in the critical area.[2]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2018). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- 1 mark per correct statement made.
- The model would stand in the critical area;
- They would wait until passing the fourth station before helping (the victim);
- This was approximately 70s after collapse
- 2 marks for one quantitative result with a comparison
- 1 mark for one quantitative result without a meaningful comparison
- e.g.
- On 5% of trials with a white victim people left the critical area compared to 9% for a black victim (2 marks);
- Of the spontaneous helpers/first helpers, 90% were male/64% were white (1 mark) ORA
- In 20% of trials people moved away (from the critical area)/in total 34 people left the area (1 mark) (together = 2 marks)
- Males helped more than females (1 mark)
- 'Early' models were more likely to elicit other helpers (n=4) more than 'late' models (n=2) (2 marks)
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →