O-LevelPakistan StudiesThe history and culture of PakistanMay/June 2023 · Q125 Marks
This question is about the influence of Indian leaders in the subcontinent between 1750 and 1840. Study the sources (Insert) carefully and then answer the questions which follow.
- (a)According to Source A, Mir Jafar was unpopular as Nawab of Bengal. Identify three ways he was unpopular.[3]
- (b)What can we learn from Source B about the death of Tipu Sultan?[5]
- (c)Explain how Titu Mir protected the interests of Muslim farmers in the subcontinent in the early nineteenth century.[7]
- (d)To what extent were Indian rulers able to limit British expansion across the subcontinent between 1760 and 1840? Explain your answer.[10]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2023). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] Mir Jafar allowed the British 'to take important lands around Calcutta'
- [1] he made 'regular payments of huge sums of money to the British'
- [1] 'Mir Jafar's actions allowed the British to strengthen their trading position'
- [1] he 'almost brought about Bengal's economic collapse'
- [1] Mir Jafar 'was accused of betraying his country and his people'
- [1] 'Mir Jafar made an agreement with the British'
- [1] 'his relationship with the British'
- [1] (Surface feature) Tipu Sultan is resting on the knee of a soldier
- [1] (Surface feature) he is surrounded by soldiers
- [1] (Surface feature) the soldiers are carrying weapons/rifles with bayonets and swords
- [1] (Surface feature) a soldier is carrying a torch
- [1] (Surface feature) they are by a stone building/wall
- [1] (Surface feature) there are different uniforms
- [1] (Surface feature) there is a second body in the picture
- [1] (Surface feature) someone, not a soldier, is present clasping his hands
- [1] (Surface feature) one of the soldiers is holding Tipu Sultan's hand
- [1] (Surface feature) the soldiers looked shocked/surprised
- [1] (Valid inference) it was a sad incident
- [1] (Valid inference) it was a serious/significant incident
- [1] (Valid inference) Tipu Sultan/his body was respected
- [1] (Valid inference) it was an unexpected event
- [1] (Valid inference) it was a brutal death
- [1] (Valid inference) it was a brave/soldier's death
- [1] (Contextual knowledge) the death occurred in Fort Seringapatam
- [1] (Contextual knowledge) Tipu Sultan died on 4 May 1799
- [1] (Contextual knowledge) Tipu Sultan was a revered leader, known as a freedom fighter/Tiger of Mysore
- [1] (Contextual knowledge) with Tipu's death, Mysore came under British control
- [1] Titu Mir advocated jihad against 'non-Islamic actions'
- [1] Titu Mir raised awareness of the sufferings of Muslim farmers in West Bengal during 1830s
- [1] Titu Mir gave Muslim farmers a cause the fight back at the sufferings they encountered
- [1] Titu Mir organised a rebellion against zamindars
- [1] Titu Mir advised Muslim farmers to not pay the tax on beards
- [1] Titu Mir set up his own fort/commune near Calcutta with a small army
- [2] (May agree) Haidar Ali was undefeated against the British army (defeated the British Bombay army in 1767, broke the siege of Bangalore in 1768, captured Arcot in 1780)
- [1] (May agree) Haidar Ali signed a treaty with the British to end the war in 1769
- [1] (May agree) Tipu Sultan defeated a British army at Kollidam in 1782
- [1] (May agree) in 1784 Tipu Sultan made peace with the British and became the Sultan of Mysore
- [1] (May agree) Tipu Sultan invaded Travancore in 1789 which was a British ally
- [1] (May agree) Ranjit Singh signed agreements with the British in 1806 and 1838
- [1] (May agree) Titu Mir recruited 500 local militiamen to harass the zamindars and the British forces supporting them
- [1] (May agree) Titu Mir built a fort at Narkelbaria to protect himself and his forces against British reprisals
- [1] (Counter-argument) Tipu Sultan was defeated by the British at Seringapatam in 1799
- [1] (Counter-argument) resistance to the British from the Marathas disappeared after 1818
- [1] (Counter-argument) Titu Mir was killed in battle in 1831 when his forces were attacked
- [1] (Counter-argument) Titu Mir's fort was destroyed by British cannons
- [1] (Counter-argument) the British had a strong and well-trained army
- [1] (Counter-argument) the British had a good administrative system
- [1] (Counter-argument) the British conquests had seized vast resources, especially in Bengal, battle of Buxar etc.
- [1] (Counter-argument) the death of Ranjit Singh marked the end of effective resistance
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →