O-LevelEnglish LanguageSummary Writing1123/12 · May/June 2025 · Q325 Marks
Read Text B, Local residents against plans for city zoo, in the insert and answer Question 3.
- (a)Summarise the arguments against the plans for the zoo, according to Text B. You must use continuous writing (not note form). Use your own words as far as possible. Avoid copying long sections of the text. Your summary should be no more than 150 words. Up to 10 marks are available for the content of your answer and up to 10 marks for the quality of your writing.[20]
- (b)Imagine you are animal welfare campaigner, conservationist and documentary maker, Lucy Graves. You are taking part in a television programme about ‘Project Planet'. Give your answer to the interviewer's question, using information from the text. Interviewer's question: Our audience may be surprised to hear that you've worked closely with the zoo on 'Project Planet'. Many people are against this project. What is your opinion and why? Lucy Graves' answer:[5]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2025). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): The old zoo was a tourist attraction / famous / beautiful / iconic
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): The old zoo has been there 130 years / decades // is historic / old
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): The new location is over 40 km / far / further away // takes two bus rides (to get to) // hard to get to
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): construction / building work will cause disruption / chaos
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): The plan includes 220 apartments // unnecessary / too many apartments / offices / buildings
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): Generations / families have visited the old zoo // people love / remember / are attached to it
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): Youngsters will not see rare / endangered / wild animals (up close) (at the old site)
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): (some popular) animals are being sold (to other zoos) // (popular) animals are moving / sent to other zoos // a small number of / not all animals are moving (to new site)
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): animals to be transported / moved / sent long distances / many kilometres (to other zoos) // transport / movement of animals is unsafe / can cause stress / anxiety
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): loss of jobs / unemployment
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): no (public) consultation / discussion
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): (new site) has less / little land / is small(er)
- [1] (Arguments against zoo plans): parking restricted / not enough parking (at the new site) // no parking
- [1] (Supporting detail for Lucy Graves' opinion): animal welfare campaigner // conservationists involved (with Development: taking advice from experts / evidence that project aims to protect, preserve animals, their habitats)
- [1] (Supporting detail for Lucy Graves' opinion): education, teaching, raising awareness // not just entertainment, fun // virtual reality // interactive displays // 4D documentaries // innovative / innovative (with Development: visitors get a deeper understanding of animals / look at why animals are at risk, effect of climate change etc. more than a conventional zoo would allow / youngsters will engage with computer technology / creative / exciting)
- [1] (Supporting detail for Lucy Graves' opinion): important research // species survival plan // protect at-risk, endangered species, habitats // focus on animals most in need of help (with Development: zoos have changed / studying threats to animals / more important to prevent animals going extinct, losing habitat than entertainment)
- [1] (Supporting detail for Lucy Graves' opinion): a bigger world picture // making an impact for the future (with Development: a crucial role in the global movement to protect animals / without research, there will be consequences - no tigers, lions, lemurs for future generations)
- [1] (Supporting detail for Lucy Graves' opinion): rural location // new, far larger enclosures (with Development: improved conditions / city no place for wild animals / closer to natural habitat / nostalgia for old site with smaller enclosures does not help animals)
- [1] (Supporting detail for Lucy Graves' opinion): older zoo residents, black-eyed lemurs will be there (with Development: there will still be interesting animals to see)
- [1] (Supporting detail for Lucy Graves' opinion): free bus service, public transport // restricted parking (with Development: no need to drive / more environmentally friendly / save money)
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →