Refer to lines 48-49 and Table 1.1. Calculate the net present value (NPV).
- (a)Refer to lines 48-49 and Table 1.1. Calculate the net present value (NPV).[4]
- (b)Evaluate whether CQ should invest in measures to improve sustainability.[12]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2023). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] (a) At least one correct discounted cashflow identified for Years 1-5.
- [2] (a) Correct calculation of all discounted cash flows for years 1–5 and/or cumulative discounted cash flow of $854 800 for years 1–5.
- [1] (a) NPV = total discounted cash flows – capital cost (if no correct calculations).
- [3] (a) NPV = 0.8548 – 1.
- [4] (a) NPV = ($145 200) OR (145 200).
- [3] (a) If answer not shown as negative i.e. $145200.
- [4] (a) Allow rounding of discounted cash flows. Cumulative discounted cash flows 855 000 (2) and NPV of (145 000) (4).
- [K] (b) Understanding of sustainability – business operations that can be maintained in the long term, for example, by protecting the environment and not damaging the quality of life for future generations.
- [K] (b) Understanding of investment appraisal techniques NPV, ARR and Payback.
- [K] (b) Other factors in the decision: Cost; Availability of finance; Impact on workers/consumers; Preferences of owners.
- [APP] (b) NPV is negative. Discounted cash flows do not cover the capital cost.
- [APP] (b) Payback is 4 years 10.8 months.
- [APP] (b) Link between investment and mission statement regarding carbon neutrality.
- [APP] (b) Investment will support CQ's desire to reduce carbon emissions.
- [APP] (b) Gearing of CQ is high – 3 / 4.2 X 100 = 71.4%.
- [APP] (b) Preference of Frederico as owner.
- [APP] (b) $1m required.
- [L2 AN] (b) NPV is negative suggesting that the investment is not worth considering as will be loss making in real terms over a five-year period.
- [L2 AN] (b) Investment would boost CQ's environmental image which could result in higher sales which would increase market share.
- [L2 AN] (b) Improved environmental image would support maintenance of premium prices resulting in higher profits.
- [L2 AN] (b) Investment would reduce CQ's reliance on external supplier of energy reducing the volatility of energy costs and therefore make planning easier.
- [L2 AN] (b) High gearing may make raising finance more difficult from banking sector. This is a significant cost and could impact liquidity of CQ negatively placing a strain on its finances.
- [EVAL] (b) Supported judgement as to decision.
- [EVAL] (b) Weighing of factors.
- [EVAL] (b) Most important factor in decision.
- [EVAL] (b) Cost savings are estimates made by the Finance Manager. Can these figures be trusted?
- [EVAL] (b) The data is only on cost savings and may not account for any positive impact of the investment on sales and protection of premium price.
- [EVAL] (b) Is profit more important to CQ than fulfilling its mission statement?
- [EVAL] (b) The data is only for five years. It is likely that the data is incomplete as solar panels and insulation should bring benefits over a much longer time period.
- [EVAL] (b) Quantitative vs qualitative factors – NPV suggests that the investment is unprofitable but consistency with mission statement may be more important in long term.
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →