This question is about the consequences of economic development.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme. The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

1. Question 26 (a) Marks will be awarded for describing one economic consequence. One mark for the consequence and one for the description. E.g. Increased wealth (1) which can be invested in businesses/infrastructure (1). (2)
2. Question 26 (b) Marks will be awarded for describing one social consequence. One mark for the consequence and one for the description. E.g. Improved access to education (1) which can lead to higher literacy rates (1). (2)
3. Question 26 (c) Award up to 4 marks for explaining two ways that different levels of economic development can impact quality of life. (M1 for reason, A1 for explanation x 2). E.g. In a more developed country, there is likely to be a greater access to clean water (M1) which reduces the incidence of waterborne diseases, improving health (A1). In a less developed country, there may be a lack of employment opportunities (M1) which can lead to a lower disposable income and inability to afford basic necessities (A1). (4)
4. Question 26 (d) Award up to 7 marks for an evaluation of two different strategies that can be used to achieve sustainable development in a named country. A named country must be included for full marks. Each strategy should have a statement, a description and evaluation. Level 0: No rewardable content. Level 1: (1–3 marks) Limited description of one or two strategies used to achieve sustainable development. Little or no evaluation. May not be linked to a named country. Level 2: (4–5 marks) Description of one or two strategies used to achieve sustainable development. Limited evaluation of the strategies. May not be linked to a named country. Level 3: (6–7 marks) Detailed description of two strategies used to achieve sustainable development. Clear evaluation of both strategies. Clearly linked to a named country. (7)