Skip to main content
O-LevelEconomicsThe basic economic problem2281/21 · May/June 2023 · Q520 Marks

In Greece, rich households spend more than the average household. The amount of spending in an economy influences whether its production point is on or inside its production possibility curve (PPC). In 2020, household spending in Greece fell. This affected some firms' plans to merge. It also increased unemployment. More than half of those unemployed in Greece had been unemployed for more than a year.

  1. (a)Identify two reasons why rich households spend more than the average household.[2]
  2. (b)Explain the significance of a production point inside a PPC and a production point on its PPC.[4]
  3. (c)Analyse why someone who has been unemployed for more than a year may not get another job.[6]
  4. (d)Discuss whether or not a government should encourage firms to merge.[8]

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2023). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [2] Two from: higher incomes; find it easier to borrow; more confidence; more savings / more wealth; high cost of luxury goods and services; maintaining / showing status; rich households may choose to have large families.
  2. [4] Logical explanation which might include: A point inside a PPC means output is lower than potentially achievable (1) there are unemployed resources / there is inefficient use of resources (1). A point on a PPC means output is at its maximum (1) all resources are employed / full employment / there is efficient use of resources (1). A production point shows a combination of goods produced (1) example e.g. X capital goods and Y consumer goods (1).
  3. [6] Coherent analysis which might include: May lose skills (1) qualifications may become out of date (1) may experience ill-health (1) lack of recent job experience (1) high cost of retraining (1) may become less attractive to employers (1). Skills may be outdated (1) industry in decline (1) will need retraining (1). Economy could be in recession (1) with high number of people unemployed and few vacancies (1). May lose confidence / become discouraged / depressed (1) put less effort into finding another job (1). Unemployed workers may be occupationally immobile (1) geographically immobile (1). Unemployment/welfare benefits may be high (1) may be above low wages / maybe sufficient to live on (1). May face discrimination (1) on grounds of e.g. age (1). May retire (1) and leave the labour force (1).
  4. [8] Why it should: may result in economies of scale; lower average costs of production; lower prices for consumers; raise quality of products; increase international competitiveness and improve current account; improved performance may increase profits and corporation tax. Why it should not: may result in diseconomies of scale; may increase monopoly power / reduce competition; raise prices; may reduce innovation; rationalisation may result in some workers losing their jobs; should be left to market forces to decide.

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
The basic economic problem, O-Level Economics (syllabus 2281). Structured question, 20 marks.
Source
O-Level Economics, May/June 2023 Paper 2 Variant 1, question 5.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Economics questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep