In a mixed economic system, such as Portugal's, the government intervenes in the economy. Reasons for government intervention include to correct market failure and to achieve its aims for the economy, such as control of inflation. In 2017, one-fifth of Portugal's population was living in poverty and the government increased its spending.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2019). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

1. [2] The existence of external costs (1) and external benefits (1). Abuse of monopoly power (1) advertising distorting choice (1). Inefficient allocation of resources / not producing the right quantity / not producing at the lowest possible cost (1).
2. [4] Resources in the public sector (1) are allocated by government decisions/directives (1) products are produced by state-owned enterprises resources are allocated to overcome market failure (1). Resources in the private sector (1) are allocated by the price mechanism / market forces / demand and supply / firms / consumer sovereignty (1) profit provides an incentive for firms to produce what consumers demand (1).
3. [6] Inflation may raise the price of basic necessities (1) reducing purchasing power of the poor (1) increasing absolute poverty (1). Inflation may reduce the value of any savings the poor have (1) reducing their ability to access e.g. healthcare, education and housing (1) reducing job opportunities (1). Inflation may reduce the country's international competitiveness (1) lower output (1) increase unemployment (1) making it more difficult for the poor to gain jobs (1). Inflation may reduce the purchasing power of state benefits (1) e.g. pensions or unemployment (1). The poor may be less likely to belong to trade unions (1) less ability to raise wages (1).
4. [8] Up to 5 marks for why it might: Government spending will increase total (aggregate) demand (1) this may encourage firms to produce more (1) economic growth may increase (1) deflation may be avoided (1) and unemployment may fall (1) the poor may gain jobs (1) making income more evenly distributed (1). Government spending on healthcare (1) may raise living standards / life expectancy (1). Government spending on education (1) may improve environmental standards (1). Government subsidies (1) may increase labour productivity (1) costs of production may fall (1) lowering cost-push inflation (1) increasing international competitiveness (1) improving the current account position (1). Government spending on state benefits (1) may reduce income inequality (1) may raise living standards (1). Up to 5 marks for why it might not: Higher government spending may cause inflation (1) if total supply does not rise in line with total demand (1). Some of the higher income created may be spent on imports (1) this may increase a current account deficit (1). An increase in government spending on unemployment benefits (1) may increase voluntary unemployment (1).