In 2016, the Indonesian government increased its spending on healthcare and education and considered raising the school leaving age. The government also planned to increase taxation. Such a move might conflict with its aim of reducing unemployment at a time when a number of countries were at risk of entering a recession.
- (a)Identify two types of tax.[2]
- (b)Explain two benefits to a government from a fall in unemployment.[4]
- (c)Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC) diagram, the effects of high unemployment in a country.[6]
- (d)Discuss whether or not a government should raise the school leaving age.[8]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2018). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] Direct
- [1] indirect
- [1] progressive
- [1] regressive
- [1] proportional
- [1] VAT/GST
- [1] excise duty
- [1] income tax
- [1] corporation tax
- [1] inheritance tax
- [1] lump sum tax
- [1] specific tax
- [1] ad valorem tax
- [1] Rise in tax revenue (direct/indirect)
- [1] people earning more / people spending more / output higher
- [1] Fall in expenditure on unemployment benefit
- [1] enabling government to spend on other areas e.g. healthcare/education
- [1] May help the government achieve its macroeconomic objectives
- [1] e.g. raise GDP / achieve full employment
- Diagram up to 3 marks:
- axes labelled Capital Goods & Consumer Goods (also accept any other combination as long as it is clear that it is two separate products, and not Price and Quantity)
- a curve bowed outwards or a downward sloping straight line drawn to the axes
- point inside the curve identified as point of unemployment e.g. X
- Written analysis up to 3 marks:
- high unemployment means that the available resources are not fully (1) and efficiently used (1)
- the economy will not be able to produce at its maximum level (1) i.e. on the PPC (1) output of the economy is smaller than the maximum (1) lower than potential living standards (1)
- May be negative or lower economic growth / recession (1)
- Up to 5 marks for why it should:
- [1] More time in education may increase workers' skills
- [1] raise qualifications
- [1] reduce unemployment
- [1] raise productivity
- [1] increase output / increase economic growth
- [1] raise wages / increase living standards / increase HDI / reduce poverty
- [1] lower costs of production / improved quality of products
- [1] increase net exports / raise exports / lower imports
- [1] improve the current account position
- [1] May improve life expectancy / health
- [1] by making people better informed
- [1] May attract more MNCs to set up in the country
- [1] reduce their training costs / raise the quality of their output
- Up to 5 marks for why it should not:
- [1] May increase government spending
- [1] it will involve the use of extra resources
- [1] there will be an opportunity cost involved
- [1] example
- [1] In the short run the labour force will be reduced
- [1] lower potential output
- [1] A greater quantity of education does not necessarily mean a rise in quality of education
- [1] Some of those who receive the extra years, of schooling may not take full advantage of these
- [1] which may disrupt the learning of others
- [1] The dependency ratio may rise
- [1] tax rates may have to be increased
- [1] Families may not be able to afford the extra years schooling
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →