Explain two advantages and two disadvantages of VP's Restaurant Managers delegating tasks to their Assistant Managers.
- (a)Explain two advantages and two disadvantages of VP's Restaurant Managers delegating tasks to their Assistant Managers.[8]
- (b)Using Appendix 2 and other information, consider the two countries VP could choose to locate its new restaurants. Which country should VP choose? Justify your answer.[12]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2023). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] (a) (Advantage) Restaurant Managers cannot carry out every job themselves/reduce workload - they can then focus on the most important tasks at the fast-food restaurant and make better decisions
- [1] (a) (Advantage) Restaurant Managers are less likely to make mistakes – as they can focus on specific tasks such as marketing new menus
- [1] (a) (Advantage) Gives the Restaurant Managers time to assess employees performance below them in the hierarchy – they can then identify where employees need more support/training in developing/cooking new recipes
- [1] (a) (Advantage) May increase motivation/feel more trusted for Assistant Managers – improved speed of serving fast-food
- [1] (a) (Advantage) Assistant Managers may develop new skills
- [1] (a) (Disadvantage) Restaurant Managers could lose some control over subordinates – mistakes may be made leading to worse reputation if food is served longer than 5 minutes after ordering
- [1] (a) (Disadvantage) Restaurant Managers may be reluctant to give up some control – if Assistant Managers do a good job carrying out the delegated tasks such as ordering new ingredients for the meals
- [1] (a) (Disadvantage) The Assistant Manager may not have the skills to carry out the tasks that have been delegated to them/may need additional training – may lead to poor decisions being made such as unskilled chefs being employed at the restaurant
- [1] (a) (Disadvantage) Assistant Managers may not like having tasks delegated to them/feel overloaded with work by Restaurant Managers
- [1] (b) (Country A Benefit) Gross profit is $14, and Country B is $8
- [1] (b) (Country A Benefit) Highest price per meal at $20 – possibly highest revenue if demand remains high
- [1] (b) (Country A Benefit) Many competitors may indicate that there is high demand for fast-food restaurants
- [1] (b) (Country A Drawback) There are many competitors so demand may be lower - may have to reduce price to attract customers – possibly reducing revenue
- [1] (b) (Country A Drawback) May have to spend more on marketing as there are many competitors in the market in order to enter the new market abroad - increasing costs
- [1] (b) (Country A Drawback) Higher wage costs at twice the cost of Country B – may lead to higher costs overall
- [1] (b) (Country A Drawback) Harder to recruit new workers as unemployment is low - may have to offer more fringe benefits to attract employees from their many competitors
- [1] (b) (Country B Benefit) Lowest variable cost per meal at $2 rather than $6 in country A – makes it easier to charge the lowest price of $10 per meal
- [1] (b) (Country B Benefit) High unemployment makes it easier to recruit new employees for the restaurants – more likely to remain with VP as few alternative employment opportunities in country B – lowering recruitment costs/training costs in the future
- [1] (b) (Country B Benefit) Lowest wage costs at $5 per hour – reducing total labour costs
- [1] (b) (Country B Benefit) Low price at $10 per meal may attract many customers – possibly increasing revenue
- [1] (b) (Country B Drawback) Lower gross profit between price of $10 and costs of $2 = $8, whereas it is $14 in country A
- [1] (b) (Country B Drawback) Few competitors may indicate that demand for vegetarian fast-food in country B is low - VP needs to spend on market research to be sure there is a market in country B – investment could be wasted if there is not a sufficient demand to make the expansion successful
- [1] (b) (Justification) VP should choose country A as it can charge the highest price of $20 per meal which may lead to higher revenue and costs are likely to be lower as variable costs are lower at $6 which gives a higher gross profit, so after expenses have been paid, it may lead to higher profit. Country B should not be chosen because it has a lower price per meal and unemployment is high and there may be lower demand.
- [1] (b) (Justification) VP should choose country B as it has the lowest wage costs, and it will be easy to recruit new employees as there is high unemployment there.
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →