The number of cars arriving at a certain road junction on a weekday morning has a Poisson distribution with mean 4.6 per minute. Traffic lights are installed at the junction and a council officer wishes to test at the 2% significance level whether there are now fewer cars arriving. He notes the number of cars arriving during a randomly chosen 2-minute period.
- (a)State suitable null and alternative hypotheses for the test.[1]
- (b)Find the critical region for the test.[4]
- (c)The officer notes that, during a randomly chosen 2-minute period on a weekday morning, exactly 5 cars arrive at the junction. Carry out the test.[2]
- (d)State, with a reason, whether it is possible that a Type I error has been made in carrying out the test in part (c).[1]
- (e)The number of cars arriving at another junction on a weekday morning also has a Poisson distribution with mean 4.6 per minute. Use a suitable approximating distribution to find the probability that more than 300 cars will arrive at this junction in an hour.[3]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2022). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [B1] H0: Pop mean = 4.6 [or 9.2] H1: Pop mean < 4.6 [or 9.2] or λ = 4.6 or μ (Not just 'mean') or λ < 4.6
- [B1] Use of Poisson with λ = 9.2 SOI
- [M1] P(X ≤ 3) = e^-9.2(1 + 9.2 + 9.2^2/2 +9.2^3/3!) = 0.0184 or 0.018 [< 0.02] At least one of these attempted correct λ (with Poisson expression seen not implied)
- [*A1] Both correct SC Use of λ = 4.6 scores B1 for P(X = 0) = 0.01[0][1] and P(X < 1) = 0.056[3]only
- [DA1] CR is X < 3 From CWO and at least one comparison seen SC If M0 awarded allow *B1 for both 0.018 and 0.049 or better and DB1 for correct critical region from CWO and at least one comparison seen.
- [M1] 5 is not in critical region OR P(X < 5) =0.104 > 0.02 so [not reject Ho] no evidence that number of cars arriving is now fewer For a comparison (i.e. 5 > 3) OE
- [A1 FT] In context, not definite No contradictions e.g. not 'No. of cars arriving is not fewer' ft their critical region if used (but must be from Poisson and integers)
- [B1 FT] No, because Ho was not rejected FT OE, FT their (c)
- [B1] N(276, 276) SOI
- [M1] (300.5-276)/√276 [= 1.475] Standardising with their values Allow with wrong or no continuity correction
- [M1] 1 – Φ('1.475') = 0.0701 (3 s.f.) For area consistent with their values
- [A1] As final answer
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →