Students in Brazil did fieldwork to investigate infiltration. Infiltration is the process by which water soaks into the soil. The students worked in two groups to do their fieldwork in a river valley. They created two transects (A and B) going away from the river. These are shown in Fig. 8 (Insert). The hypotheses investigated by the students were: Hypothesis 1: The infiltration rate decreases as distance from the river increases. Hypothesis 2: The infiltration rate decreases as soil moisture content increases. Soil moisture content is the quantity of water in the soil.
- (a)Which one of the following pieces of equipment would they use to create a transect? Tick (✔) your answer. Equipment Tick (✔) callipers clipboard quadrat rope ruler[1]
- (b)(i)To investigate Hypothesis 1 the students in group A collected data to measure the rate (speed) of infiltration at equal distances along transect A. Fig. 9 (Insert) shows the method they used to do this. Describe how the students measured the rate (speed) of infiltration to get the results shown in Table 1 (Insert).[3]
- (b)(ii)The students recorded the water level in the tube every minute for 10 minutes or until there was no water left. The results of their measurements at sites 4 and 7 are shown in Table 1 (Insert). Use these results to complete the measurements for site 4 in Fig. 10 below. [Figure 10][2]
- (b)(iii)The students then calculated the infiltration rate at each site. Their calculation for site 4 is shown below. Infiltration rate = fall in water level (mm) / time (min) = 70 / 10 = 7.0 mm per min Use the data in Table 1 to show the calculation which produced the result for site 7 in the space below.[1]
- (b)(iv)The measurements of distance from the river and infiltration rate at the different fieldwork sites on transect A are shown in Table 2 (Insert). The students plotted these results on a graph, Fig. 11 below. Complete the graph by plotting the result for site 7. [Figure 11][1]
- (b)(v)What conclusion would the students in group A make about Hypothesis 1: The infiltration rate decreases as distance from the river increases? Support your answer with evidence from Fig. 11 and Table 2.[3]
- (c)(i)The students in group B did the same fieldwork along transect B shown in Fig. 8 (Insert). Their results are shown in Fig. 12 below. [Figure 12] Compare the results of the two groups on transects A and B. Use evidence from Figs. 11 and 12 in your answer.[2]
- (c)(ii)As the results of the two groups were different their teacher checked their measurements and calculations and agreed that they had not made any errors. Suggest why the two groups got different results. Look at Fig. 8 to help you to answer.[4]
- (d)(i)To investigate Hypothesis 2: The infiltration rate decreases as soil moisture content increases, the two groups of students measured the soil moisture content at each sampling site along their transects. Fig. 13 (Insert) shows students' fieldwork notes which describe the two different methods that the groups used. Suggest three advantages of method 2 for measuring soil moisture content. 1 2 3[3]
- (d)(ii)The results for transects A and B are shown in Table 3 (Insert). Use this data to plot the results at site 3 on transect B in Fig. 14 below. [Figure 14][2]
- (d)(iii)Which group's results agree with Hypothesis 2: The infiltration rate decreases as soil moisture content increases? Circle your decision below. Group A on Transect A Group B on Transect B Support your decision with evidence from Fig. 14 and Table 3.[3]
- (e)If the students repeated their infiltration measurements after a week of heavy rain, how and why would the infiltration rates be different?[2]
- (f)The area around the river where the students did their fieldwork is a popular tourist area. Suggest how and explain why people walking in the area might affect the infiltration rate.[3]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2017). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- 7(a) Rope
- 7(b)(i) Tube / measuring tube pushed / knocked / placed /inserted into soil / ground (1); Fixed / measured / some water in container (1); Pour amount / 120 mm into measuring tube (1); Measure height of water in tube every minute (1); Use a stopwatch / timer (1)
- 7(b)(ii) Plot minutes 8 / 55, 9 / 53 and 10 / 50 for site 4 on Fig. 3; 1 or 2 correct = 1; 3 correct = 2
- 7(b)(iii) 24 / 10 OR 120-96 / 10; Allow 24 above dotted line and 10 underneath it
- 7(b)(iv) Plot infiltration rate of 2.4 at site 7/140 m
- 7(b)(v) 1 mark reserve for correct hypothesis decision (1); Evidence; Infiltration rate decreases at each site further away from the river (1); Credit paired data for site/distance and infiltration rate of two sites e.g. At Site 1 / 20 m from river rate is 15 mm per min but at Site 7 / 140 metres from river to 2.4 mm per min (1 MAX)
- 7(c)(i) Negative relationship between distance from the river and infiltration rate along Transect A / Fig. 4 OR constant / regular / certain trend (1); No relationship / pattern / trend between distance from the river and infiltration rate along Transect B / Fig. 5 OR the relationship is random / fluctuates / scattered / not constant / irregular (1); Allow 1 max if opposite used, e.g. constant / not constant or scattered / not scattered
- 7(c)(ii) Examples: Need to compare two transects land-uses; On transect A steeper slope / slope increases away from river, but on transect B gentler slope (1); Infiltration rate decreases on transect A as slope becomes steeper (1); On transect A soil changes from sand to clay away from river, but on transect B soil does not change / mixed sand and clay (1); Infiltration rate is quicker on sandy soil in transect A (1); On transect A the ground is cleared / bare ground away from river, but on transect B grass / trees do not change (1) OR more vegetation in B (1); Infiltration rate is quicker on transect B in area with vegetation away from the river (1)
- 7(d)(i) Quick / easy / simple method / easy to do / easy to use / easy to read (1); No need to do calculation / gives instant / direct result / does not need formula (1); Less student error / exact / precise / accurate / reliable (1); Several readings can be taken at once and an average worked out (1); Portable / can be used on site / small amount of equipment (1); Can measure equal / 10 cm / even depths (1)
- 7(d)(ii) Plot soil moisture content (4.3%) and infiltration rate (13.2) at Site 3. (Credit IR plot on the line, not close to it)
- 7(d)(iii) Group A on transect A – 1 mark reserve (1); Evidence all from transect A; transect A - infiltration rate decreases as soil moisture content increases from Site 1 to Site 7 / at all sites / each point / every point as you move away from the river (1); Credit paired data from two sites, e.g. at Site 1 / at start rate is 15 mm per min and 1.6% and at Site 7 / finish to 2.4 mm per min but soil moisture content to 8.8% (1)
- 7(e) How: infiltration rate would be lower / decrease / slower (1); Why: soil is saturated / soil moisture content is higher (1)
- 7(f) People compress / compact the ground / ground hardens / denser (1); Water cannot soak into the ground as quickly / less gaps in soil (1); Lowers infiltration rate / slows down infiltration / harder to infiltrate (1); Impermeable footpaths may be built for tourists, reducing infiltration (1)
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →