Students were studying different residential areas of cities in MEDCs. They decided to do some fieldwork to compare different types of housing area in the 'inner city'. They chose to study three areas: • Area A: an area of houses which were built around 1850 • Area B: an area of terraced houses which were built around 1920 • Area C: an area of houses and apartment blocks which were built when the area was redeveloped around 1990 The students investigated the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: The newer the housing area the better the environment. Hypothesis 2: Parking and traffic are problems for people living in all three inner city areas.
- (a)(i)First the students did a pilot survey in a road near their school. Suggest two reasons why they did a pilot survey.[2]
- (a)(ii)Describe how the students used the recording sheet shown in Fig. 12.[2]
- (a)(iii)Suggest two ways that the students could have organised themselves to make sure that their results were reliable. Give a reason for each way you suggest.[4]
- (b)(i)When the students had completed their environmental quality survey they calculated the average results of the roads they had surveyed in each of the three areas. These results are shown in Table 3 below. Complete Table 3 by adding the total score for the roads in area C.[1]
- (b)(ii)Use the results for ‘Housing layout and design' to complete the graphs for the roads in areas A and B in Fig. 13 opposite.[2]
- (b)(iii)The students decided that Hypothesis 1: The newer the housing area the better the environment, was partly true. Use data from Table 3 and Fig. 13 to support their conclusion.[4]
- (c)(i)To investigate Hypothesis 2: Parking and traffic are problems for people living in all three inner city areas, the students used a questionnaire with residents in each of the three areas. This is shown in Fig. 14 (Insert). Name a sampling method the students could use to get a representative sample of people to take part in their survey. Name of sampling method Give two reasons for your choice. 1 2[3]
- (c)(ii)What was the students' conclusion about Hypothesis 2: Parking and traffic are problems for people living in all three inner city areas? Support your decision with evidence from Table 5.[4]
- (c)(iii)The main reasons why people thought that parking and traffic were problems are shown in Table 6 (Insert). Use this information to complete Fig. 15 below for parking.[2]
- (c)(iv)Suggest a different way to improve each of the following in inner city areas. Parking Traffic problems[2]
- (d)To extend their fieldwork the students wanted to investigate another possible difference between the three housing areas. Suggest an investigation and describe a method you would use. Investigation Fieldwork method[4]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2014). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1 + 1 = 2] (a) (i) Examples Opportunity to test descriptions are appropriate (1)
- Opportunity to test that all features are covered in survey (1)
- Practise/improve methodology/know what to do (1)
- Check consistency of applying scoring criteria (1)
- [1 + 1 = 2] (ii) Examples Filled in/circled the location (1)
- Look at/observe each feature (1)
- Made a decision/give opinion about the score for each category (1)
- Put a tick/record/give score/mark in the appropriate row/box (1)
- Add up/work out total in column (1)
- [2 × (1 + 1) = 4] (iii) Examples: 1 for each suggestion and 1 for each reason Work in groups (1)
- So other students check scores (1)
- Makes results less subjective/biased/consistent/can take an average (1)
- Go to different areas (1)
- So they survey as many roads as possible in each area (1)
- Gives a larger sample (1)
- Makes efficient use of time (1)
- Do surveys on same day/at same time/under same conditions (1)
- So comparisons between areas more consistent (1)
- [1] (b) (i) Total = +11 + sign not essential
- [1 + 1 = 2] (ii) Completion of graphs for areas A (+1) and B (-3).
- [1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4] (iii) Examples: Need 4 references to data/the table.
- Area C/newest has highest score/ +11 (1) compared to +6/−14 (1)
- Area C/newest has 7 positive scores/only 1 negative/mostly positive/vandalism and graffiti only negative (1)
- Area A/oldest does not have lowest score (1) is +6 compared to −14 (1)
- Area A/oldest has positive total score/6 positive scores (1)
- Area B/middle age has lowest/negative score (1) of –14 compared to +6/+11 (1)
- Area B has negative score in all 8 categories (1)
- [1R + (1 + 1) = 3] (c) (i) Stratified only acceptable
- Examples of reasons for Stratified
- Will get people from different age groups (1)
- Will get people from different genders (1)
- Will get people from different socio-economic groups (1)
- [(1R + 1 + 1 + 1) = 4] (ii) Hypothesis is partly true/false/untrue/incorrect
- Evidence
- True for parking and traffic in areas A & B (1) with 3.8 and 3.3 (1) or with 3.8 higher than the other two for parking (1) or with 3.7 higher than others for traffic (1)
- Parking not true for area C (1) with 1.8 being lowest (1)
- Traffic not true for area C (1) with 1.5 being lowest (1)
- Scores in areas A and B = agree/strongly agree (1) as more above 3 (1)
- Scores in area C = disagree/strongly disagree (1) as more below 2 (1)
- If no decision given credit evidence for correct hypothesis to max 3
- [1 + 1 = 2] (iii) Completion of divided bar graph
- 1 mark for both dividing lines at correct values from the left (20 and 39)
- 1 mark for shading in correct order and direction from the left.
- [1 + 1 = 2] (iv) Parking examples Create more off-road parking areas/car parks/multi-storey parking/underground parking or garaging (1)
- Create permit parking system/residents reserved spaces (1).
- ALSO Park and ride schemes (Max 1 if in both)
- Traffic examples Build by-pass/ring road/one way system/flyover (1)
- Exclude heavy vehicles from residential areas (1)
- Congestion level charging at peak times of day (1)
- Better public transport/bus lanes (1)
- Odd/even number plates on different days (1)
- Cycle lanes (1)
- Car sharing (1)
- [1R + 3 = 4] (d) Must be plausible NEW investigations that could be carried out in the three housing areas; not those already done in the Question, i.e. NOT any of those listed in Table 2 and NOT Parking/Traffic from Table 4.
- Examples of new ideas that are deemed implausible/inappropriate but can get max 2 for how they would carry out.
- Income, employment, health, population structure, type of housing.
- Examples of possible ideas OK for max marks = 4.
- Price of houses (1)
- Access for services/shopping (1)
- Safety of an area (1)
- Litter (1)
- Height of buildings (1)
- Appropriate methods such as:
- Questionnaire (1)
- House price survey (1)
- Convenience index (1)
- Mark on maps (1)
- Credit details of how such a study would be done inc. recording.
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →