Skip to main content
A-LevelEconomicsGovernment microeconomic intervention9708/42 · Oct/Nov 2018 · Q120 Marks

What's to be done about rising inequality? There is great inequality of income and wealth in the United States (US), that many believe is not equitable. It seems, even to some of those who benefit from this inequality, that something should be done to reduce it. What are the strongest reasons for trying to bring about greater equality of income and wealth? One obvious reason for redistributing resources from the rich to the poor is simply that this is a way of making the poor better off. Many people in the world are poor, and the improvement in their lives that richer people could bring about by giving money is enormous by comparison with the small sacrifice that this would involve. Redistributing assets increases the well-being of the poor more than it decreases that of the rich. A justification for reducing inequality through non-voluntary means, such as taxation, needs to explain why redistribution of this kind is not just arbitrary. The possibility of making the poor better off is not the only reason for seeking to reduce the world's rising level of economic inequality. Many people in the US believe that high and rising levels of inequality are objectionable. It is worth inquiring into why this might be so. 1. Economic inequality can give wealthier people an unacceptable degree of control over the lives of others, for example over where and how they can work, what they can buy and in general what their lives will be like. 2. Economic inequality can undermine the fairness of political institutions. If those who hold political offices depend on large private contributions for their election campaigns, they may be more responsive to the interests and demands of wealthy contributors, and those who are not rich will not be fairly represented. 3. Economic inequality undermines the fairness of the economic system itself by making it difficult, if not impossible, to create equality of opportunity. For example, it means that some children will enter the workforce much better prepared than others and people with few assets find it harder to access a loan to start a business or to pay for higher education. Source: Reasons we should fix economic inequality, TM Scanlon, accessed 19 April 2016 Fig. 1.1: Change in real annual pay in the US, 1979–2013 Source: Adapted from EPI analysis of data from Kopczuk, Saez and Song (2010) and Social Administration wage statistics. (Accessed 19 April 2016)

  1. (a)The article says that many in the US believe that inequality is not equitable. What is the difference between equality and equity?[2]
  2. (b)Explain, using the article, two ways in which inequality is considered harmful.[4]
  3. (c)Consider whether the changes in real annual pay shown in Fig. 1.1 support the idea of rising inequality in the US.[6]
  4. (d)The article refers to a reduction of inequality through taxation. Discuss the effectiveness of fiscal policy in redistributing income.[8]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2018). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] (a) Equity refers to fairness and is a normative concept
  2. [1] (a) Equality implies identical positions e.g. pay
  3. [1] (b) Too much control/power to the wealthy.
  4. [1] (b) Undermines fairness of political institutions.
  5. [1] (b) Makes it difficult to create equality of opportunity for the less well off
  6. [1] (b) Inequality is harmful to the poor because they suffer disproportionately.
  7. [1] (c) Both trends are generally upwards
  8. [1] (c) The average wage earner has risen just over 30%
  9. [1] (c) and has limited change since 2000
  10. [1] (c) Top 1% has risen 140%
  11. [1] (c) From 2000 the top 1% has seen considerable fluctuations
  12. [up to 2] (c) Consideration of the limitations of the diagram
  13. [1] (c) Conclusion: The diagram does support the idea of rising inequality
  14. [1] (d) Fiscal policy definition
  15. [up to 4] (d) Discuss the effectiveness of: Regressive/Progressive taxes. (these terms need not be referred to directly)
  16. [up to 4] (d) Discuss the effectiveness of: Transfer payments/Subsidies Direct provision of goods and services
  17. [1] (d) Conclusion

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
Government microeconomic intervention, A-Level Economics (syllabus 9708). Structured question, 20 marks.
Source
A-Level Economics, Oct/Nov 2018 Paper 4 Variant 2, question 1.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Economics questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep