A study by Snyder and DeBono (1985) used students to investigate how high self-monitors and low self-monitors evaluated different types of advertisements. Their results appear in Table 2.1, in which there is a maximum score of 12. Higher scores indicate greater favourability towards image-oriented advertisements and lower scores indicate greater favourability towards product-quality-orientated advertisements. [Table 2.1] Table 2.1 | Product | Canadian Club whisky | Barclay cigarettes | Irish Mocha Mint coffee | |---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------|-------------------------| | Self-monitoring category | High | 6.84 | 5.00 | 7.40 | | | Low | 4.88 | 3.68 | 6.08 |
📋 Examiner Report & Trap Analysis
Common mistake: 62% of candidates selected the distractor because they confused... The examiner specifically designed this question to test whether students can differentiate between... To secure full marks, candidates must demonstrate...
🎯 Mark Scheme Breakdown
Award 1 mark for identifying the correct principle. Award 1 mark for showing clear working. Common errors include failing to convert units and misreading the scale. The examiner report notes that only 34% of candidates achieved full marks on this question.
Unlock the Examiner's Analysis
Sign up for free to reveal the full examiner report, trap analysis, and mark scheme breakdown for this question.
Sign Up Free to Unlock →Join thousands of Cambridge students already using Oracle Prep