Skip to main content
A-LevelEconomicsGovernment macroeconomic intervention9708/42 · Feb/Mar 2017 · Q120 Marks

The power of Finance Ministers to make a difference to an economy is exaggerated. Political parties would argue that Finance Ministers have the ability to form policies that lead to the creation of jobs, the building of houses, and the encouragement of economic growth. The reality is that Finance Ministers are usually at the mercy of the economy rather than in control of it. The Finance Minister has a limited macroeconomic range of policy measures. Interest rates, bond markets, international trade markets, company investment policies and changes in consumer spending are far more important than Finance Ministers in shaping the economy and determining tax revenues. Consider monetary policy. This is often controlled by central banks. In 2015, there were low interest rates across much of the world. These lower borrowing costs could encourage firms to invest and this may result in increased employment. Statistics for unemployment and the level of interest rates for India from 2010 to 2014 are given below in [Figure 1.0]. In international trade markets some economies improved in 2015 because of the halving of the crude oil price a benefit for companies and households with an effect on inflation that allowed interest rates to stay low. However, part of the benefit of such a change in the general price level would be short-term if oil prices recovered. Another influence on the economy can be a high level of immigration which could increase the working population and possibly increase employment and production. Immigration is not controlled by the Finance Minister. Some consider that the best hope for improving an economy is on the supply side. But supply-side policies are also often the responsibility of ministers other than the Finance Minister and take a long time to become effective. A further economic boost could be a rise in house prices. House price rises encourage consumer confidence and stimulate retail sales. Moving house often results in re-decoration, modernisation and the purchase of household items. However, house price rises, or the corresponding rent increases, can sometimes be out of proportion to wage rates and make it impossible for many people to purchase property or to move. Source: The Times, 18 April 2015

  1. (a)The information refers to supply-side policies. Explain, with two examples, what is meant by supply-side policies.[4]
  2. (b)Explain briefly the link between the rate of interest, investment and employment. Consider whether this is supported by the information in Fig. 1.[4]
  3. (c)The information refers to rising house prices and politicians sometimes say such a rise is a sign of an improvement in the economy. Analyse how the economy is claimed to benefit from rising house prices but can also benefit from falling oil prices.[6]
  4. (d)Summarise the main argument of the information. Discuss whether there is sufficient evidence in the information to support it.[6]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (Feb/Mar 2017). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [2] Supply-side policies are mainly micro-economic policies aimed at making markets and industries operate more efficiently.
  2. [2] Examples: education/training, reducing planning regulations, changing labour/employment rules, encouraging research
  3. [4] Low interest, encourages borrowing/investment, may encourage employment – depends on capital/labour ratios, chart is equivocal about this – e.g. rates rose in 2011 but unemployment fell, fairly constant rates 2012–14 but unemployment still falling.
  4. [3] House price rises raise household wealth, may extend mortgages increases willingness to spend. Expenditure increases on modernisation of houses.
  5. [3] Oil prices affected costs of production, encourages investment. Lower costs for household bills, more money to spend on other items.
  6. [3] Argument: finance minister has little power. Gives examples of other influences, firms investment, central banks, consumer spending, immigration, international trade.
  7. [3] However although article mentions lack of power it does not mention what influence the Finance Minister might have in terms of tax changes, both direct and indirect, on revenue and expenditure policies, on effect of tax changes on consumer spending - maybe on house purchases, durable consumer goods. Tax changes affect consumer and producer spending and investment, affect government revenue and public spending. Conclusion.

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
Government macroeconomic intervention, A-Level Economics (syllabus 9708). Structured question, 20 marks.
Source
A-Level Economics, Feb/Mar 2017 Paper 4 Variant 2, question 1.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Economics questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep