Skip to main content
A-LevelEconomicsGovernment Intervention / Public FinanceMay/June 2019Paper 2 Q120 Marks

Egypt's economic difficulties Table 1.1: Egypt, selected economic indicators, 2014–2019 | | Consumer Price Index (base year 2000) | Current account balance (US$ billion) | Unemployment rate (% of total labour force) | |---|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------| | 2014 | 304 | –2.356 | 13.4 | | 2015 | 337 | –12.182 | 12.9 | | 2016 | 371 | –18.659 | 12.7 | | 2017 | 453* | not available | 12.6* | | 2018 | 530* | not available | 11.8* | | 2019 | 587* | not available | 10.7* | * International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2017 Egypt's Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS) reported that Egypt's annual inflation rate surged to 32.9% in April 2017, compared to 10.9% in 2016. This is considerably higher than the expected rate that was estimated by the IMF shown in Table 1.1. Inflation had been rising in Egypt since the decision of the Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) in November 2016 to float Egypt's currency (the Egyptian pound) in a move that caused a 50% depreciation in its value against the US dollar. This came as part of the Egyptian government's reform programme, started in 2014, to reduce the budget deficit and acquire a US$12 billion loan from the IMF to ease the US dollar shortage that had restricted Egypt's business activity. A macroeconomic research group has said that ‘The sharp rise in inflation could largely be attributed to the effects of the weaker Egyptian pound. Inflation was also made worse by levying a new indirect tax called Value Added Tax (VAT), and cutting subsidies on energy in November 2016.' On the same day as the CBE floated the Egyptian pound it raised the interest rate by 3 percentage points to 14.75%. Egypt's VAT replaced the previous sales tax, which economists said created market distortions. It was expected to broaden the tax base in a country where the government struggles to collect income tax because of a large informal economy and widespread tax avoidance. The VAT does not apply to basic goods and services to protect the poor. Source: Islam Al Naggar, Egypt Today, 10 May 2017, and Reuters, 29 August 2016

✓ Correct Answer

The correct answer is . This question tests the candidate's understanding of government intervention / public finance within the Economicssyllabus. The examiner's mark scheme requires...

📋 Examiner Report & Trap Analysis

Common mistake: 62% of candidates selected the distractor because they confused... The examiner specifically designed this question to test whether students can differentiate between... To secure full marks, candidates must demonstrate...

🔒

Unlock the Examiner's Answer

Sign up for free to reveal the correct answer, the official mark scheme breakdown, and the examiner trap analysis for this question.

Sign Up Free to Unlock →

Join thousands of Cambridge students already using Oracle Prep

About This A-Level Economics Question

This structured question appeared in the Cambridge A-Level Economics (9708) May/June 2019 examination, Paper 2 Variant 2. It tests the topic of Government Intervention / Public Finance and is worth 20 marks.

Oracle Prep provides AI-powered practice for all Cambridge O-Level and A-Level subjects. Our platform includes topic predictions with 87.7% accuracy, AI essay grading, and a comprehensive question bank spanning 25 years of past papers.

© 2026 Oracle Prep — The AI-Powered Cambridge Exam Engine