Changes in the world oil market and their effects Founded in 1960, the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), consisted of five countries all of whom produced oil. OPEC's success, with Saudi Arabia as its market leader, encouraged other oil exporting countries to join. There are now 12 OPEC member countries, including Iran, Nigeria and Venezuela. OPEC is responsible for over 35% of world oil production, working together to fix prices and control output. OPEC has faced various external shocks. In recent years, the financial crisis 2008–2011 reduced global demand for oil. Also, since 2012, non-OPEC oil supplies have increased, as shown in Fig. 1, mainly due to the use of fracking — a process of extracting oil from rock using very expensive drilling equipment. This has happened in spite of opposition to fracking by environmentalists who accuse the fracking companies of causing minor earthquakes and polluting underground water sources. The main oil producer using fracking is the United States (US) which has become almost self-sufficient in oil and consequently does not need to rely on OPEC. In 2014, the US even began to export its oil, especially to Europe as a rival to OPEC and Russia. This had an effect on the price of oil as shown on the chart in Fig. 2. There have been both winners and losers from this change in production of oil. While all oil importing countries have become winners as the price of oil declines, undoubtedly the US has strengthened its economy the most. The fracking boom has increased consumer spending in the US, which has been a key element in the recovery of the US economy from the financial crisis. The losers are OPEC's members that are dependent on oil as the main source of revenue. Nigeria greatly overestimated the price of oil and, as a result, it had to devalue its currency in November 2014, raise taxes on luxury items and cut government spending by 6%. Fig. 1 Supply of oil 2012–2015 [Figure 1.1] Fig. 2 World price of oil 2013-2014 [Figure 1.2] Despite the fall in oil prices, in January 2015 Saudi Arabia refused to agree to demands from other OPEC members to cut oil supplies in order to keep prices high. Saudi Arabia was happy to allow oil prices to fall further in order to put US fracking companies out of business. Source: The Times, 5 December 2014 and 7 January 2015
- (a)Define what is meant by a cartel and explain why a cartel might be formed.[3]
- (b)What evidence is there in the information that OPEC is a cartel?[4]
- (c)Given the information above, analyse with the help of an appropriate diagram whether the overall price change shown in Fig. 2 is consistent with what would be expected in the market for oil.[5]
- (d)Is there any evidence in the information that might lead to the conclusion that the US economy is a winner in the short run but could become a loser in the long run?[8]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2017). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] group of companies/countries
- [1] acting together to fix output
- [1] and prices
- [1] selling the same good
- [1] It is not obviously a cartel but there is a market leader (Saudi Arabia)
- [1] over 35% world supply
- [1] output constant
- [1] with evidence from Fig.1
- [1] comment on Fig.2
- [1] output has increased in 2013/14 (from text)
- [1] on D/S diagram S curve would move out
- [1] price would fall
- [1] information consistent with theory
- [4] Winner in the short-run: It has reduced the dependence on OPEC's oil supplies – reduces imports – and has begun to export resulting in an improved balance of trade / BOP. Increased earnings in the USA leading to increased consumption – multiplier effect - recovery from financial crisis.
- [4] Loser in the long-run: Cost of fracking may become higher (very expensive equipment) so costs become greater than world oil price – hence Saudi Arabia wants to allow the price to fall further. Opposition to fracking (negative externalities) environmental lobby tries to curb supplies. US$ may become too strong if its economy strengthens leading to more expensive oil for importing countries and a possible loss of markets to rival suppliers in OPEC and Russia.
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →