Skip to main content
A-LevelEconomicsInternational economic issues9708/23 · May/June 2017 · Q120 Marks

Zambia bears the brunt of China's economic slowdown [Figure 1: Zambian kwacha and copper price] Zambia was one of Africa's main beneficiaries when China's economy was expanding. With copper its key export, China's huge demand for minerals helped the southern African nation enjoy a decade of economic boom. But as China's economy slows down, Zambia finds itself with real problems. A large mining group has announced it is to suspend production for 18 months. In addition, a Chinese-owned company has said it will suspend operations and cut jobs in Zambia because of the copper price. The situation highlights the vulnerability of Africa's resource-dependent nations to the fortunes of China. Zambia is Africa's second biggest copper producer and depends on the metal for about 70% of its foreign exchange earnings and 25–30% of government revenue. Copper prices have fallen 18% this year, sliding to a six year low of below US$5000 per tonne last month. As a result, Zambia has been ranked top of an index of African nations most exposed to China's slowdown. In 2012, Zambian exports to China amounted to 4.3% of Zambia's national income. During the boom years, mining led to billions of dollars of investment. Much of this was foreign direct investment from China. The sector was a key driver of Zambia's economy, which grew by an annual average of 6.4% over the last decade one of the world's fastest growth rates. The Zambian government is now struggling to balance its budget. It is expected that the 2015 fiscal deficit will be much greater than previously estimated, and the government has pledged to reduce its spending. A further problem is that the weakness of Zambia's currency, the kwacha, risks feeding through into inflation. The government has spoken of the need for economic diversification to reduce the country's dependence on copper. This is a tough task which China's slowdown has highlighted for many resource-rich African nations.

  1. (a)(i)What is the overall trend in the value of the Zambian kwacha from January 2014 to September 2015 shown in Fig. 1?[1]
  2. (a)(ii)Explain why the economic slowdown in China has resulted in this change in the value of the kwacha.[3]
  3. (a)(iii)Explain how the change in the value of the kwacha might feed into inflation in Zambia.[4]
  4. (b)Explain how the fall in China's demand for copper would be likely to affect each of the components of aggregate demand in Zambia.[6]
  5. (c)Consider whether economic theory would support the view that diversification of the Zambian economy is the most effective way of tackling the problems it faces as a result of the slowdown of China's economy.[6]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2017). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] The trend in the value of the Kwacha is declining or downward
  2. [1] For an explanation of the fall in the demand and the price of copper as a result of China's slowdown
  3. [2] For an explanation of how the fall in the price of copper has resulted in a fall in the demand for the Kwacha and a fall in the Kwacha's value as the demand for the currency is less than the supply.
  4. [1] For recognition that a fall in the value of the Kwacha will make Zambia's imports more expensive.
  5. [2] For an explanation that this will lead to rising costs for Zambia's producers and consumers
  6. [1] For clear recognition that this represents cost-push inflation
  7. Allow credit for explanations of demand-pull inflation if consistent with the context of the extract.
  8. [2] For identification of all the components of aggregate demand: C+I+G+X-M Or Consumption + Investment + government spending + net exports
  9. [1] how consumption might be affected
  10. [1] how investment might be affected
  11. [1] how government spending might be affected
  12. [1] how net exports might be affected
  13. [1] For identifying and explaining the relevant economic theory
  14. [3] For a discussion of the costs and benefits of diversification
  15. [3] For a discussion of the costs and benefits of specialisation
  16. [1] For a reasoned conclusion on whether specialisation or diversification is more effective.

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
International economic issues, A-Level Economics (syllabus 9708). Structured question, 20 marks.
Source
A-Level Economics, May/June 2017 Paper 2 Variant 3, question 1.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Economics questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep