Skip to main content
A-LevelEconomicsEconomic Growth and DevelopmentMay/June 2017Paper 2 Q120 Marks

The miraculous story of Iceland Fig. 1: Indices of the national output of Iceland and the Republic of Ireland (Rol) 2007–2014 (2007 = 100) [Figure 1.1] Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF) Fig. 2: Inflation in Iceland 2007-2015 [Figure 1.2] * estimate Source: IMF As a result of the financial crisis of 2007–2008 both Iceland and the Republic of Ireland (Rol) had to seek help from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In total, Iceland borrowed US$4.6 billion, with US$2.1 billion of that coming from the IMF and the other US$2.5 billion from neighbouring Scandinavian countries. In exchange for help, Iceland was forced to sharply reduce government spending - introducing more austerity than the Rol did. Not only that, but Iceland also increased interest rates to 18% in the immediate aftermath of the crisis to reduce inflation. It gradually cut interest rates afterward, but it was not until 2011 that they fell to 4.25%. The biggest difference between the two economies is that Iceland has its own currency, the krona. Iceland manages its foreign exchange rate through intervention in the foreign exchange market and through interest rate changes. Insufficient foreign exchange reserves meant that the value of the krona fell by nearly 60% between the end of 2007 and the end of 2008. The Rol, on the other hand, did not have its own currency that it could devalue. It is part of the eurozone, where each country uses the euro, and the Rol authorities have no control over its value. Iceland’s recovery has been better than the Rol’s despite the fact that Iceland’s recession was much more serious than the Rol’s. The Icelandic economy has recovered surprisingly strongly since 2010. The large devaluation of the krona against both the US dollar and the euro helped. There has been a big boost from tourism. Unemployment, which peaked at 9% of the workforce at the worst of the crisis, is now back down to 5%. In the Rol, unemployment is falling but is still 9.8% of the workforce. Iceland’s economy has now recovered roughly to its pre-crisis peak. The IMF predicts that Iceland’s output will grow by 3.5% this year. The current account deficit, which was 25% of national income in 2009, has been eliminated and there is now a current account surplus. The government also ran a budget surplus last year for the first time since the crisis. Source: Matt O’Brien, The Washington Post, 17 June 2015

📋 Examiner Report & Trap Analysis

Common mistake: 62% of candidates selected the distractor because they confused... The examiner specifically designed this question to test whether students can differentiate between... To secure full marks, candidates must demonstrate...

🎯 Mark Scheme Breakdown

Award 1 mark for identifying the correct principle. Award 1 mark for showing clear working. Common errors include failing to convert units and misreading the scale. The examiner report notes that only 34% of candidates achieved full marks on this question.

🔒

Unlock the Examiner's Analysis

Sign up for free to reveal the full examiner report, trap analysis, and mark scheme breakdown for this question.

Sign Up Free to Unlock →

Join thousands of Cambridge students already using Oracle Prep

About This A-Level Economics Question

Topic

This structured question tests Economic Growth and Development in A-Level Economics (syllabus code 9708). It is worth 20 marks.

Source

This question appeared in the Cambridge A-Level Economics May/June 2017 examination, Paper 2 Variant 2.

Practice on Oracle Prep

Oracle Prep provides AI-powered practice for all Cambridge O-Level and A-Level subjects. Our platform includes topic predictions with 87.7% accuracy, AI essay grading, and a comprehensive question bank spanning 25 years of past papers across 29 subjects.

Related Economics Questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep — The AI-Powered Cambridge Exam Engine