Skip to main content
A-LevelEconomicsThe MacroeconomyMay/June 2017Paper 2 Q120 Marks

Fall in price of oil but Colombia can look forward to growth Fig. 1: Colombia's growth and the oil price Fig. 2: Colombian peso against the US dollar (peso per US$), inverted scale Over the past year, the halving of crude oil prices has hit Colombia and much of South America hard. Venezuela's economy, for example, is expected to shrink by 7% this year. Colombia's national oil production was running at 1 million barrels a year, accounting for half of its exports and a fifth of government revenues. In Puerto Gaitan, which only a year ago was the centre of Colombia's oil industry, the town's population had tripled to 45000 in just a few years. Property prices had soared and hotels overflowed. Today, though, business profits have fallen, leading to a fall in spending by entrepreneurs. “For Sale” signs now hang over Puerto Gaitan's closed stores, car parks in shopping malls are empty and 10000 people have left the town. Towns throughout Colombia are experiencing similar problems. Colombia's government is feeling the effects as well. Every US$1 drop in the oil price per barrel cuts an estimated US$200 million from government revenues. As a result, the government has cut spending and raised taxes to keep its budget deficit down. More worryingly, the collapse in the price of oil has opened a large current account deficit equivalent to 7% of national income. Yet not all is bleak. Colombia's economy is forecast to grow this year. And unlike in neighbouring Venezuela, where oil accounts for more than 90% of exports, there is concern but no panic. Firstly, the peso's depreciation could reverse Colombia's current account problems, boosting traditional exports such as coffee, textiles, car parts and flowers if not to its immediate neighbours, then to the United States. Colombia produces oil, but it is not only an oil-producing country. Secondly, Colombia's government is having peace talks with Marxist rebels to end the country's five decades of unrest. The government's military expenditure will be reduced and estimates suggest that this 'peace dividend' could add as much as 2 percentage points to growth. Source: The Financial Times, 2015

✓ Correct Answer

The correct answer is . This question tests the candidate's understanding of the macroeconomy within the Economicssyllabus. The examiner's mark scheme requires...

📋 Examiner Report & Trap Analysis

Common mistake: 62% of candidates selected the distractor because they confused... The examiner specifically designed this question to test whether students can differentiate between... To secure full marks, candidates must demonstrate...

🔒

Unlock the Examiner's Answer

Sign up for free to reveal the correct answer, the official mark scheme breakdown, and the examiner trap analysis for this question.

Sign Up Free to Unlock →

Join thousands of Cambridge students already using Oracle Prep

About This A-Level Economics Question

This structured question appeared in the Cambridge A-Level Economics (9708) May/June 2017 examination, Paper 2 Variant 1. It tests the topic of The Macroeconomy and is worth 20 marks.

Oracle Prep provides AI-powered practice for all Cambridge O-Level and A-Level subjects. Our platform includes topic predictions with 87.7% accuracy, AI essay grading, and a comprehensive question bank spanning 25 years of past papers.

© 2026 Oracle Prep — The AI-Powered Cambridge Exam Engine