Concern in Vietnam over trade with China Table 1: The Value of Vietnam's Trade in Goods with Selected Trading Partners: January–July 2014 | | United States | China | Japan | South Korea | Germany | | :------------------- | :------------ | :---- | :---- | :---------- | :-------- | | Exports of Goods (US$ billion) | 15.9 | 8.6 | 8.5 | 3.7 | 2.9 | | Imports of Goods (US$ billion) | 3.7 | 23.7 | 6.9 | 12.2 | 1.4 | Source: Vietnam Customs Tycoon to the rescue as cheap Chinese goods overwhelm Vietnam's economy Vietnam is enjoying rapid growth but its small businesses are being overwhelmed by a huge influx of cheap, mass-produced goods from China. These goods are undercutting the prices of domestically produced items. A Vietnamese entrepreneur has a rescue plan designed to support new business start-ups. He has spent US$27 million developing his V+ shopping mall. He is now offering new businesses rent-free 50-year leases in the mall, which is located in Hanoi as long as they sell only Vietnamese-made products. He is also urging the Vietnamese government to introduce this idea nationwide to prevent the closure of tens of thousands of businesses each year and encourage customers to buy Vietnamese products. "China exports to the world at very, very low prices and that's put huge pressure on the Vietnamese economy," he explained. “I'm a businessman, I understand why firms can't develop. Without this kind of support, Vietnamese businesses will perish.” China's recent devaluation of its currency, the yuan, triggered fears of China overwhelming Vietnam with even cheaper goods. As a result, Vietnam's central bank devalued the Vietnamese currency, the dong. Despite the Vietnamese dislike of Chinese products, their prices make them unavoidable when Vietnamese businesses lack funds and household budgets are modest. There have been calls for boycotts of Chinese goods but they have all failed miserably. An economist at the Asian Development Bank, however, said the V+ concept showed good intentions but the government should only support firms with the potential to compete. "There needs to be a change in the government's policy,” he said. “It needs to move away from subsidies for all goods towards targeted subsidies for industries with the potential to compete." Source: Martin Petty, The Times, 18 April 2015
✓ Correct Answer
The correct answer is —. This question tests the candidate's understanding of international trade and balance of payments within the Economicssyllabus. The examiner's mark scheme requires...
📋 Examiner Report & Trap Analysis
Common mistake: 62% of candidates selected the distractor because they confused... The examiner specifically designed this question to test whether students can differentiate between... To secure full marks, candidates must demonstrate...
Unlock the Examiner's Answer
Sign up for free to reveal the correct answer, the official mark scheme breakdown, and the examiner trap analysis for this question.
Sign Up Free to Unlock →Join thousands of Cambridge students already using Oracle Prep