Skip to main content
A-LevelEconomicsThe macroeconomy9708/22 · Oct/Nov 2024 · Q120 Marks

Can economic growth in Chile reduce income and wealth inequality? Chile is the world's biggest copper producer with 28% of global copper production and the second biggest producer of lithium with 22% of world production. Overall, mining contributes 11% of the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and more than 50% of the value of the country's total exports. World copper and lithium prices have increased quickly since 2020. This has led to strong growth in GDP which is expected to increase by 3.5% in 2022, exceeding earlier estimates of 2.5% as world demand is expected to grow following the Covid-19 pandemic. Fig 1.1 shows the world price of copper in United States dollars (US$) per pound (lb) weight. A pound is 454 grammes. [Figure 1.1] Economic growth in Chile has also been helped by the world's highest rate of vaccination against Covid-19 and a rapid economic recovery from the pandemic which has led to a large increase in consumer spending. However, the trade in goods surplus has fallen substantially in February 2022. This is mainly because of a 9.2% fall in the revenue from copper exports due to the higher prices and a fall in world demand during the Covid-19 pandemic. There has also been a 38.3% increase in the value of imported consumer goods. As a consequence, the current account deficit has widened substantially to US$7.5bn in the first quarter of 2022 from a deficit of US1.1bn in the first quarter of 2021 despite a surplus of US50m in the secondary income account. [Figure 1.2] One of the main benefits of Chile's increased prosperity in recent years has been a decline in the number of people living at or below the minimum income level of US$5.50 per day. However, Chile remains the most unequal country in the list of largely developed countries according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) with an income gap 65% wider than the OECD average. In addition, although the Gini coefficient has fallen from 52.1 to 44.4, this is still higher than lower-income countries such as Haiti and El Salvador. To try and reduce this inequality in income and wealth, the Chilean government has increased its expenditure on education from 3% of GDP in 1997 to 5.4% in 2018. Further recognition of the importance of education as a merit good is shown by the government increasing its education spending by 3.4% each year since 2018. Chile has also recently made all college tuition free of charge. It is hoped that this will reduce the gap in the quality of education received by the wealthiest and poorest students and open up opportunities for everyone.

  1. (a)Identify two possible reasons why the current account on the balance of payments in Chile is in deficit in the first quarter of 2022 despite the surplus on the balance of trade in goods.[2]
  2. (b)Consider the likely success of one policy that Chile could use to reduce the imports of consumer goods.[4]
  3. (c)Explain what is meant by the fall in Chile's Gini coefficient from 52.1 to 44.4.[2]
  4. (d)Assess the extent to which 'the government increasing its education spending' may improve the incomes of poorer households in Chile.[6]
  5. (e)Assess the likely impact of the rise in the world copper price from 2020 on the future economic growth of Chile.[6]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2024). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] Deficit in the primary account.
  2. [1] Deficit in the balance of services.
  3. OR [1] Reference to fall in revenue from copper exports, increase in imported consumer goods, or impact of pandemic, (from page 2 text) with an additional [1] if linked to a deficit in the primary account or balance of services.
  4. [1] Identification of a valid policy (e.g., tariff or quota).
  5. [Up to 2] Explanation of how the policy reduces imports (e.g., tariff increases price, quota limits quantity).
  6. [1] Evaluation of the policy's likely success (e.g., considering PED for tariffs).
  7. [1] The Gini coefficient measures income inequality.
  8. [1] A fall in the Gini coefficient means that income is more equally distributed.
  9. [AO1/AO2 Up to 4] Explanation / Analysis (maximum 3 marks if only one side is considered):
  10. Reasons/benefits for increasing education spending to improve poorer households' incomes (up to 3 points): Education as a merit good, leading to better educated/skilled workforce. Increased availability of education provision and free college tuition fees making it more affordable. Reduced other costs of education, increasing affordability and accessibility. Raising awareness of education benefits for poorer households.
  11. Reasons why increased spending may not have desired effects (up to 3 points): Lack of awareness due to information failure. Higher opportunity costs for poorer households (need to earn income earlier). Government spending may be unsustainable, leading to future reductions.
  12. [AO3 Up to 2] Evaluation (no marks if only one side is considered):
  13. Assessment of advantages and disadvantages of increasing education expenditure on improving living standards of poorer households, including assessment of the time for the policy to have desired effect (extent).
  14. Valid conclusion.
  15. [AO1/AO2 Up to 4] Explanation / Analysis (maximum 3 marks if only one side is considered):
  16. Advantages of a rise in copper prices (up to 3 points): Mining is crucial to Chile's economy (50% of exports, 11% of GDP). Rising world demand and inelastic PED for copper lead to increased export revenue and GDP.
  17. Disadvantages of a rise in copper prices (up to 3 points): Fall in copper export revenue despite higher prices (Feb 2022) suggests more elastic PED/substitutes, potentially reducing revenue/GDP if prices keep rising. May encourage more competition from other producing countries. Copper is a finite resource; extensive mining could lead to future depletion and fall in export revenue/GDP.
  18. [AO3 Up to 2] Evaluation (no marks if only one side is considered):
  19. Assessment of both sides, including argument that recent fall in revenue might be temporary due to demand downturn and could change as the world economy starts to grow again (extent).
  20. Valid conclusion.

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
The macroeconomy, A-Level Economics (syllabus 9708). Structured question, 20 marks.
Source
A-Level Economics, Oct/Nov 2024 Paper 2 Variant 2, question 1.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Economics questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep