Skip to main content
A-LevelEconomicsGovernment macroeconomic intervention9708/42 · Oct/Nov 2019 · Q120 Marks

The Economic Outlook for Japan In 2017, the forecast of the Bank of Japan (the country's central bank) was that Japan's economy was likely to enjoy moderate growth. Domestic demand was likely to increase due to spending in both the corporate and household sectors. Expansionary monetary policy and fiscal spending by the government had produced a large-scale stimulus. As part of the Japanese government's economic strategy, progress was expected in overcoming deflation through quantitative easing. Supply-side measures included regulatory and institutional reforms; increased labour participation by women and the elderly, and support for firms in their efforts to improve productivity. The Bank of Japan stated that business investment was likely to continue to increase, supported by expansionary monetary policy, heightened growth expectations, and increases in demand related to the Olympic Games to be held in Japan in 2020. Private consumption was expected to continue to increase as employee incomes continued to improve. Public investment was projected to increase during 2017, due mainly to government measures and was expected to remain at a relatively high level after 2017. Meanwhile, other advanced economies were expected to continue to grow steadily and a recovery in emerging economies was expected as a result of their own policy measures and the growth in the advanced economies. Japan's exports were expected to rise as a result of an improvement in the economies of its trading partners and the depreciation of Japan's currency, the yen. There was also an upward revision of GDP following a change in the calculation of GDP statistics. The projected financial conditions suggested that real interest rates were likely to remain very low. Source: Bank of Japan, Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices, January 2017 [Figure 1.1: Japan's inflation rate, 2012–2016] [Figure 1.2: Changes in Japan's money supply (M3), 2011–2016] Source: Trading Economics, 2017 and Bank of Japan Annual Review, 2017

  1. (a)Identify two positive influences on Japan's economic growth.[2]
  2. (b)To what extent do Fig. 1.1 and Fig. 1.2 support Friedman's view that 'inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon'?[5]
  3. (c)Explain the likely impact of quantitative easing on the Japanese economy.[6]
  4. (d)Discuss the possible effects on the Japanese economy of the changes in supply-side policy and international economic events described in the article.[7]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2019). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] expansionary monetary policy
  2. [1] fiscal spending/public investment
  3. [1] investment/spending in corporate sector
  4. [1] private consumption/spending in household sector
  5. [1] Olympic-related spending
  6. [1] rise in exports
  7. [1] labour participation rate
  8. [1] employee incomes continued to improve
  9. [2] Up to 2 marks for comment that SUPPORTS the view
  10. [2] Up to 2 marks for comment that CONTRADICTS the view
  11. [1] During 2013-2014, inflation rose significantly from --1% to nearly 4% before falling again to around 0% (1 mark); at the same time there were increases in the growth rate of money supply (1 mark).
  12. [1] However, there does not appear to be a close relationship (1 mark), as in some periods, M3 growth rose but prices fell, 2015–2016 (1 mark).
  13. [1] Conclusion (1 mark) – the evidence from the Figs. is mixed.
  14. Max. 1 mark if answer quotes graph but draws no conclusions
  15. [1] Lower interest rates
  16. [1] This boosts investment or consumption
  17. [1] Increased AD
  18. [1] Should lead to increased output/employment
  19. [1] Could lead to depreciation of the currency
  20. [1] Could be inflationary
  21. [1] Identification of supply-side policy measures (1 mark) e.g. regulatory or institutional reforms.
  22. [2] Effects of supply-side policy changes (up to 2 marks) – effect on productivity and on AS/output.
  23. [1] Identification of international economic events (1 mark) e.g. depreciation of yen.
  24. [2] Effects of international economic events, (up to 2 marks) – effect on AD/demand.
  25. [1] Conclusion - increased employment/inflation/growth; balance of changes in AD and AS (1 mark)

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
Government macroeconomic intervention, A-Level Economics (syllabus 9708). Structured question, 20 marks.
Source
A-Level Economics, Oct/Nov 2019 Paper 4 Variant 2, question 1.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Economics questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep