Ethiopia to develop through infrastructure investment Extract 1: Ethiopia economic overview With 99.4 million people, Ethiopia has the second largest population in Sub-Saharan Africa. Its annual population growth rate was 2.5% in 2015. It is also one of the world's poorest countries. The country's per capita income of US$590 is substantially lower than the regional average. In 2011, 33.5% of the population lived in extreme poverty. The economy has experienced strong and broad-based growth over the past decade, averaging 10.8% per year between 2003 and 2015 compared to the regional average of 5.4% per year. Private consumption and public investment have been the main drivers of aggregate demand in recent years. In 2017, the government was implementing the second phase of its Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP II), due to run from 2015 to 2020. Its aim was to continue improvements in physical infrastructure through public investment, transforming the country into a manufacturing hub. The goal was to reduce poverty in Ethiopia by 2025. Developments in the balance of payments in Ethiopia have been largely driven by the implementation of major infrastructure projects in the country that contributed to higher current account deficits, balanced by growing foreign direct investment (FDI) and long-term foreign borrowings. Source: World Bank, April 2017 Extract 2: Ethiopia plans US$90 million infrastructure spending spree Despite Ethiopia being a landlocked country, the vast majority of its imports and exports are conveyed by sea. The ports in neighbouring country Djibouti are crucial to Ethiopia because they are used for 90% of its trade. In January 2017, a US$4 billion railway project was officially completed linking Ethiopia's capital, Addis Ababa, to the main port in Djibouti, cutting the travel time along the route from three days to just 12 hours. It was expected to cut the cost of transporting freight by a third, having a huge impact on trade flow and the lives of Ethiopians. The project was partially built and funded by Chinese companies with the assistance of the Chinese government. China Railway Group and the China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation built the railway line, while China loaned Ethiopia US$2.49 billion to build the new railway. Contracts were awarded to Chinese firms to build various sections of the railway. Chinese investment in Ethiopia's infrastructure provides opportunities for Chinese steel and construction industries. China has an overcapacity in steel and needs to find markets for its excess supply. China also has the technical expertise and companies available to assist in major foreign infrastructure projects. Chinese infrastructure investment in Ethiopia is not just limited to the railway network. Chinese firms are also building more than 65% of the new roads in Ethiopia including the prominent Addis Ababa ring road. As part of its policy of investing in infrastructure, the Ethiopian government is spending US89 million of its own revenue upgrading the national road network. Source: Neil Ford, African Business, 21 March 2017 Table 1.1: Ethiopia's current account of the balance of payments, 2015 Balance of trade in goods and services (US million) -14275 Current account balance (US$ million) -7427 Table 1.2: Ethiopia's Foreign Direct Investment inflows, 2012–2015 (US$ millions) Year | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | 279 | 1281 | 2132 | 2168 Source for tables: IMF World Economic Outlook, October 2016
- (a)(i)Suggest two reasons that would explain why Ethiopia's current account balance differs from its balance of trade in goods and services in 2015 as shown in Table 1.1.[2]
- (a)(ii)Explain one possible impact on Ethiopia's balance of trade in goods and services of operating the new railway line to Djibouti.[2]
- (b)Identify two ways in which China's economy would benefit from the building of infrastructure in Ethiopia.[2]
- (c)Use a production possibility curve to explain the opportunity cost that Ethiopia would face if it did not have access to help from China in building new infrastructure.[4]
- (d)Consider whether a road network, such as that upgraded in Ethiopia with government funds, should be classified as a public good.[4]
- (e)Use aggregate demand and aggregate supply analysis to discuss how output, employment and prices might be affected by the development of infrastructure in Ethiopia.[6]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2019). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [1] reference to the balance of profits, interest and dividends (primary income balance)
- [1] reference to the balance of current transfer payments (secondary income balance)
- [1] For an explanation that the cost of exporting and/or importing goods should fall
- [1] could have a 'positive' effect on the balance of trade in goods and services if the new railway line results in exports becoming greater than imports
- [1] could have a 'negative' effect on the balance of trade in goods and services if the new railway line results in exports becoming less than imports
- [1] could have no effect on the balance of trade in goods if the new railway line results in exports becoming equal to the imports
- [1] inflow of profits to China
- [1] reduction in unemployment
- [1] For an accurate PPC with appropriate choices on the axes
- [1] that demonstrates the opportunity cost of choosing infrastructure or consumption/living standards
- [2] For a clear explanation of the opportunity cost of using internal resources rather than Chinese funds in terms of the sacrifice of living standards that would be required
- [1] explaining two characteristics of public goods: non-excludability
- [1] non-rivalry in consumption
- [2] applying these characteristics to the upgraded road network and concluding that the network is not a public good
- [1] spending on infrastructure will shift the aggregate demand curve to the right
- [1] development of infrastructure will shift the aggregate supply curve to the right
- [4] discussion of the impact upon output, employment and prices that considers the relative change in both aggregate demand and aggregate supply
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →