Amar Singh explained why he sells 'exotic' produce, such as broccoli and iceberg lettuce, at his vegetable stall in Mumbai. “I have to keep the customer in my grasp,” he said. Mr Singh has traded for 20 years, and is not worried by the supermarkets whose stores have recently opened nearby. “They are cheaper,” he said, “but they cannot match me on quality.” In India, the 11 million small traders like Mr Singh are protected. India's complex rules have made it difficult for supermarkets from developed countries to enter the Indian grocery market. Also, India's domestic supermarkets account for only 2% of food and grocery sales and are struggling to make a profit. Revenues have not kept pace with rising rents. Reliance Fresh, one of India's big supermarket companies, has recently closed some shops around Mumbai. The companies had hoped that as India became richer, its consumers would abandon kiranas (small family-owned shops) and stalls such as Mr Singh's for modern supermarkets. This has not happened. This may be because 70% of India's population are rural dwellers so a localised strategy is vital to accommodate the variation in languages and cultures. India's kiranas are often described as neighbourhood stores, embedded in their local communities. Many have been run by the same families for generations. They have a deep understanding of the local market and a good relationship with their customers, some of whom are loyal to the shop that their parents used. Today's kirana and stall owners make product recommendations, offer credit to help shoppers balance their budgets, and can even obtain products not normally stocked. They will also deliver shopping to customers free of charge – something that the supermarkets struggle to match. Long-established kirana retailers often also benefit from prime store locations, leaving modern supermarkets struggling to find space in existing shopping areas. Instead, supermarkets are forced to look for new places to develop larger stores. Fig. 1.1 shows the results of a survey of customers in the largest cities in India to find their preferred place to purchase groceries and vegetables. [Figure 1.1]
- (a)Identify two ways in which kiranas compete for customers.[2]
- (b)What can be concluded about the groceries and vegetables trade in India from Fig. 1.1?[5]
- (c)Use economic analysis to suggest the market structure in which kiranas operate and explain how equilibrium is reached by a firm in such a market.[6]
- (d)Discuss how it might be possible for supermarkets in India to compete with the stalls and kiranas.[7]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2019). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [2] (a) Must be distinct points:
- ∞ exotic / fresh produce / quality
- ∞ government intervention
- ∞ prime locations
- ∞ credit facilities
- ∞ home delivery
- ∞ sourcing products not normally stocked
- ∞ local knowledge
- [5] (b) Candidates can write about the type of store and / or the composition of the grocery / vegetable trade.
- For example:
- ∞ Online grocers least used, more for groceries than vegetables
- ∞ Stalls and kiranas most used, vegetables the most common closely followed by grocery and vegetable sales, relatively few groceries-only customers
- ∞ Supermarkets the second most-used with limited vegetables sales
- ∞ Home delivery kirana customers more grocery-heavy, in contrast to those who visit the shops and stalls.
- [6] (c) 1 mark for identification of Monopolistic Competition
- Up to 2 marks for explanation / characteristics
- Up to 3 marks for analysis of Monopolistic Competition short run or long run equilibrium.
- If wrong market structure identified allow up to 3 marks for analysis of short run or long run equilibrium of the market chosen.
- [7] (d) Up to 4 marks for analysing why it might be possible:
- ∞ Supermarkets can enjoy economies of scale, reduces LRAC and therefore prices allowing them to compete.
- ∞ For example can spread the cost of advertising across multiple stores to increase their demand, can buy products in bulk and so enjoy lower unit costs, can use specialisation of labour.
- ∞ Credit facilities, delivery quality.
- Up to 4 marks for analysing why it might not be possible:
- ∞ Many good sites already occupied by kiranas, therefore a barrier to location.
- ∞ Small shops compete on knowledge, convenience and personal relationships, hence still attract consumers.
- ∞ Large proportion of India's population lives in rural villages and may be many kilometres from supermarkets.
- ∞ Average incomes for many are low therefore idea of weekly / monthly shop is limited and therefore limits supermarket demand.
- 1 mark for a conclusion.
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →