5 (a) Pigs are farm animals used for livestock in some parts of the world. The first genetically modified (transgenic) pigs were produced in 1985. Foreign DNA was injected directly into the nuclei of zygotes. The foreign DNA was made up of two components: • the gene coding for human growth hormone • a section of mouse DNA that, in the presence of metal ions, allows transcription to begin.
- (a)(i)The human growth hormone synthesised by the transgenic pigs had the effect of making the pigs grow faster, larger and heavier than non-genetically modified pigs. Suggest reasons for this difference.[2]
- (a)(ii)Suggest and explain why the mouse DNA was included in the foreign DNA.[3]
- (b)(i)Only 1% of the attempts successfully produced transgenic pigs. These pigs showed higher body mass and a greater muscle to fat ratio than normal pigs. Monitoring of the pigs' behaviour revealed that they rested more than normal pigs, suffered from stomach ulcers and were unwilling to mate. Discuss whether these transgenic pigs have long term economic value.[3]
- (b)(ii)Comment on the ethics of producing transgenic pigs showing the features described.[2]
- (c)(i)In 2015 pigs were produced that had part of their genome altered by a new technique. The technique involved: • an RNA sequence designed to bind to a specific targeted pig gene • a gene-editing enzyme that is able to cut out sections of DNA. The technique was used on pig zygotes that had been created by IVF. All the zygotes treated grew into piglets and these all showed large deletions in the targeted gene. This gene coded for a specific cell surface membrane protein. The piglets did not express the protein and this gave them resistance to infection by a virus that causes a serious disease in pigs. Describe two advantages of the gene-editing technique compared to the traditional genetic modification technique used to make transgenic pigs in 1985.[2]
- (c)(ii)A scientist stated that this new technique is a form of selective breeding, so is not genetic engineering. Discuss whether this statement is true and whether public groups who oppose transgenic animals will be more or less likely to accept the new technique.[3]
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2018). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [2] any two from: (transgenic pigs – ora for normal pigs) 1 GH (concentration) higher / GH always present not just at certain times ; 2 hGH, works for longer / broken down less quickly (than pig GH); 3 increase in cell signalling; 4 increased / activates, (growth) gene, expression / transcription ; 5 increased / stimulates, cell division / mitosis; 6 (make) more, muscle / bone / fat;
- [3] any three from: 1 (mouse DNA/ it) is, the promoter ; 2 (where) RNA polymerase / transcription factor(s), bind ; 3 controls / allows / ensures / is needed for, gene expression / gene activation / mRNA production / hGH production; 4 gene can be, switched on / transcribed, by adding metal ions; 5 idea of controlling, when / where / how much, the gene is, expressed / transcribed ;
- [3] NO arguments (any two to question max three): 1 few offspring / don't pass on gene(s) / unsustainable / assisted reproduction is expensive (as problem with mating) ; 2 cost of healthcare / less growth / die young (due to ulcers); 3 people may, avoid / refuse to buy / pay less for, GM food ; 4 (GM) production cost, expensive / outweighs benefits (as 1% success); YES arguments (any two to question max three): 1 greater yield / more meat (as higher, body mass / muscle); 2 higher price / worth more money, as more muscle to fat ; 3 sell / slaughter / process, earlier / at younger age;
- [2] any two from: unethical/not good/not right, because: 1 pigs, suffer / have (stomach) ulcers / experience pain; 2 pigs cannot, behave normally / move much / exercise / keep fit / socialise / mate ; ethical/good/right, because: 1 more / better quality, meat / food, for humans ; 2 pigs suffer less than (normal) pigs given hGH by injection ;
- [2] any two from: success rate (in altering gene) is, greater / 100% (instead of 1%); (only) specific gene is altered / targets gene more precisely; (unwanted) gene is, removed / deleted / disabled / knocked out;
- [3] one or two arguments about statement's truth to question max 3: 1 not selective breeding as, DNA / genes, manipulated / altered / changed / removed ; 2 not selective breeding as IVF is used ; 3 not selective breeding as no, crossing and, selection (of offspring) / repetition ; 4 not genetic engineering as no new gene is put into, organism / zygote ; one or two reasons why more acceptable to question max 3: 5 no foreign gene inserted / no cross-species gene transfer ; 6 (only) one / single, gene, altered / silenced ; 7 (application) reduces, suffering of/ (viral) disease in, pigs ;
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →