Skip to main content
A-LevelBiologyCell membranes and transport9700/51 · Oct/Nov 2020 · Q120 Marks

Two methods of estimating the water potential of plant tissue are described. Method 1: Pieces of tissue are left in sucrose solutions of different concentrations. The percentage change in mass of the tissue is determined. Method 2: Pieces of tissue are left in sucrose solutions of different concentrations. The change in the density of the solutions in which the pieces of tissue have been left is estimated. A student compared the use of method 1 with method 2 to estimate the water potential of tissue in the fruit wall of red pepper, Capsicum annum. Fig. 1.1 shows a red pepper fruit and a labelled longitudinal section of the same fruit. [Figure 1.1] The student first used method 1. • Pieces of the red pepper fruit wall tissue of known mass were prepared. • These pieces of tissue were placed in solutions of different sucrose concentration. • The change in mass of the tissue after a period of time was calculated. The student then used method 2. • Large test-tubes were set up in pairs. • Each pair of test-tubes contained the same volume of a concentration of sucrose solution. The concentrations ranged from 0.1 moldm⁻³ to 0.7 moldm⁻³. 1. Red pepper tissue was placed in one of the test-tubes containing 0.1 moldm⁻³ sucrose solution. 2. After the tissue had been soaking in the solution for a period of time, the tissue was removed. 3. The solution from which the red pepper tissue had been removed was coloured by adding methylene blue solution. 4. One drop of this coloured solution was then placed in the other large test-tube containing 0.1 mol dm⁻³ sucrose solution as shown in Fig. 1.3. [Figure 1.3] 5. Step 1 to step 4 were repeated with the other concentrations of sucrose. • If the plant tissue has gained water from the sucrose solution in which it has been soaking, the released drop will move down in the tube. • If the plant tissue has lost water to the solution in which it has been soaking, the drop of coloured solution will be less dense and the released drop will move up in the tube. The results are shown in Fig. 1.4. [Figure 1.4] Table 1.1 shows the water potentials of the sucrose solutions used by the student in method 1 and method 2. Table 1.1 sucrose concentration/moldm⁻³ water potential/kPa 0.10 -260 0.20 -540 0.30 -860 0.40 -1120 0.50 -1450 0.60 -1800 0.70 -2180

  1. (a)(i)State the independent variable and the dependent variable in this investigation. independent .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... dependent ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................[2]
  2. (a)(ii)The student was given a 1.0moldm⁻³ stock solution of sucrose. The student decided to use the stock solution to make a range of sucrose solutions. The student made 50 cm³ of each solution. Suggest a suitable range of solutions the student could use and describe how these solutions could be made by proportional dilution of the 1.0moldm⁻³ stock solution of sucrose.[3]
  3. (b)Using the different sucrose solutions from (a)(ii), describe a method the student could use to collect the data needed to estimate the water potential of the tissue in the fruit wall of the red pepper. Do not include details of how to make the different sucrose solutions. Your method should be set out in a logical way and be detailed enough to let another person follow it.[6]
  4. (c)(i)The student calculated the percentage change in mass of the tissue. Describe how the student could have calculated the percentage change in mass of the tissue and explain why the percentage change should be used.[2]
  5. (c)(ii)Sketch a graph of the expected results on Fig. 1.2. [Figure 1.2] Include axes labels and units. Indicate how this graph could be used to estimate the sucrose concentration equivalent to the water potential of the tissue in the red pepper fruit wall.[3]
  6. (d)(i)Using the results of the experiment in Fig. 1.4 and the data in Table 1.1, state the water potential of the red pepper tissue.[1]
  7. (d)(ii)Suggest why the student thought that method 1 would give a better estimate of water potential than method 2.[3]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (Oct/Nov 2020). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] independent concentration / molarity, of sucrose (solution) ;
  2. [1] dependent change in mass / AW ;
  3. [1] five stated concentrations and units (from 1.0 mol dm-³ downwards ;
  4. [1] idea of evenly spaced ;
  5. [1] method for dilution shown for at least 2 intermediates ;
  6. [1] idea of tissue cut to (approximately) same / equal / AW, size / mass ;
  7. [1] tissue taken from the same, pepper/age of pepper / state of pepper ;
  8. [1] set up containers / named containers, containing different sucrose concentrations ;
  9. [1] same / stated, volume of sucrose solution OR enough (sucrose solution) to, cover / immerse, the tissue ;
  10. [1] covering container (to prevent evaporation) ;
  11. [1] leaving tissue (in solution) for same time ;
  12. [1] method of maintaining a constant temperature ;
  13. [1] mass of tissue measured / recorded, before and after immersion ;
  14. [1] tissue dried (with paper towel / AW) before weighing ;
  15. [1] minimum of 3 repeats and calculate mean ;
  16. [1] low risk OR medium risk qualified ;
  17. [1] final mass - initial mass / initial mass ×100 ;
  18. [1] (initial) masses, are / maybe, variable / not the same ;
  19. [1] allows qualified comparisons to be made (between masses) ;
  20. [1] x-axis labelled and unit ;
  21. [1] line crosses x-axis (only once) and trend downwards (from left to right) ;
  22. [1] idea of indication that interception on the x-axis shows water potential ;
  23. [1] -860kPa ;
  24. [1] difficult to, place / release, drop at same point in solution ;
  25. [1] judgement (of position of drop) by eye / method 2, is, subjective / qualitative / subject to human error ;
  26. [1] measurement of mass / method 1, is, objective / quantitative ;
  27. [1] method 1 can (more easily) plot a graph (to estimate water potential) ;
  28. [1] drop might disperse / disintegrate / is unstable /AW ;
  29. [1] method 2 does not take into account different masses of tissue (before initial soaking) ;
  30. [1] importance of mixing solution once tissue removed in method 2 ;
  31. [1] method 2 has not been repeated ;

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
Cell membranes and transport, A-Level Biology (syllabus 9700). Structured question, 20 marks.
Source
A-Level Biology, Oct/Nov 2020 Paper 5 Variant 1, question 1.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Biology questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep