Skip to main content
A-LevelBiologyInfectious diseases9700/51 · May/June 2023 · Q215 Marks

Sea trout, Salmo trutta, are found in rivers and coastal seawaters in many regions of the world. Sea trout lay their eggs in rivers and the young fish remain in this freshwater environment. After living for 1–8 years in freshwater rivers, sea trout migrate to the sea. Adult sea trout feed in coastal seawater regions, usually no more than 80 km from their home river. Fish farms that produce Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, may be located in the coastal seawater regions where wild sea trout are also found. Fig. 2.1 shows one cage at a fish farm. [Figure 2.1] AIR SEAWATER net to stop birds fish cage farmed Atlantic salmon wild sea trout not to scale Fig. 2.1 The increase of fish farming is thought to have caused more infections by salmon lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, in wild fish such as sea trout. When sea trout enter coastal seawater regions, they can become infected with salmon lice. Salmon lice larvae live in seawater and can move freely between fish cages and open seawater. Salmon lice attach to the skin of sea trout and feed on their skin and blood. The resulting tissue damage can sometimes cause the death of sea trout. Fig. 2.2 shows a sea trout infected with salmon lice. [Figure 2.2] body of sea trout salmon lice Fig. 2.2

  1. (a)Some scientists found out from a published source that 13 or more attached salmon lice usually cause the death of a sea trout kept in laboratory conditions. The scientists decided that each wild sea trout with 13 or more salmon lice is at risk of physiological stress and potential death. Outline a laboratory method that could be used to determine the number of salmon lice needed to cause the death of a sea trout. Suggest a suitable control that could be used to confirm that it is the salmon lice that are causing the death of the sea trout.[3]
  2. (b)(i)State one variable that should be standardised in this procedure, other than the boat and the hand net.[1]
  3. (b)(ii)Electrofishing is more likely to prevent movement in larger fish. State why this systematic error may give results that are not representative of the wild sea trout population.[1]
  4. (c)(i)Explain why the scientists calculated the percentages of sea trout with attached salmon lice.[2]
  5. (c)(ii)Use Table 2.2 to describe the evidence that supports this conclusion.[1]
  6. (c)(iii)Suggest limitations of the data shown in Table 2.1 and Table 2.2 that reduce confidence in this conclusion.[2]
  7. (d)(i)State a null hypothesis the scientists would make before carrying out statistical analysis.[1]
  8. (d)(ii)Complete Table 2.3 by indicating if the results of the statistical tests are significant or not significant.[1]
  9. (d)(iii)With reference to Fig. 2.3, state the relationship between the distance from the nearest fish farm and the mean number of attached salmon lice per wild sea trout in the coastal seawater regions of Ireland.[1]
  10. (d)(iv)With reference to Fig. 2.3, suggest why the scientists calculated the 95% confidence intervals for their data.[2]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2023). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [3] 1 idea of: add lice to container and counting lice (on trout) at death or add lice to trout (in a container) and counting lice (on trout) at death or capture trout with lice attached and count lice (on trout) at death or trout(s) with (known) different number of lice attached (in separate containers) and see which die ; 2 idea of repeat with container (of trout) / trout (in a container) with no lice present ; 3 named environmental condition in container maintained as constant (for, experimental / control / both, conditions) or named feature of trout / lice maintained as constant (for, experimental / control / both, conditions);
  2. [1] any one from: location of, boat / sampling site ; (electric) current ; time of year ;
  3. [1] any one from: idea that young / small, trout will not be caught / AW ; ora idea that there will be more lice on the fish, caught / AW (as they are older / larger) ; ora
  4. [2] allows for valid comparison; (because) number (of sea trout), sampled / AW, varies ;
  5. [1] paired data quote / manipulated data (to show year 1 to 2 increase); Data quotes: mean % with ≥ year 13 attached lice 1 2.6 2 14.9 more / higher 12.3 times increased x5.7
  6. [2] any two from: 1 no difference between year 1 and year 2 of production cycle in 2004–2005 ; 2 number of sea trout sampled was small; 3 (data from) only, 5 production cycles / 10 years ; 4 no statistical test carried out ;
  7. [1] there is no, relationship / correlation, between the number of lice (on trout) and the distance from the (nearest) fish farm ;
  8. [1] (Ireland) significant / yes / ✓ / AW and (Scotland) not significant / no / × / AW ;
  9. [1] there is a negative correlation or as distance from (nearest) fish farm increases, (mean) number of lice (per trout) decreases ; ora
  10. [2] Max one from MP1–3 reasons for 95% CI: 1 95%, probability / confidence that/chance that, the, true / actual / population / parametric, mean lies within, this range / these limits or 2 to test whether the means (for number lice per trout at different distances from fish farms) are (significantly) different or to see / test, whether the, error bars / 95% CI / they, overlap or 3 to get a measure of how close the, calculated / AW, mean is likely to be to the, true / AW, mean or shorter, error bars / 95% CI, show true mean is likely to be closer to the calculated mean or longer, error bars / 95% CI, show true mean is likely to be further from the calculated mean ; One mark for exemplification: Exemplification of MP 2 or 3 from Fig. 2.3: MP2 Exemplification: idea that no / less overlap of (95% CI) error bars for Ireland, so (difference), is / may be, significant or idea that overlap of (95% CI) error bars for, Scotland / Ireland, so (difference), is not / may not be, significant; I direct comparison between Ireland with Scotland MP3 Exemplification: idea that the, shorter / narrower, error bars for Ireland the closer the calculated mean is (likely to be) to the true mean or idea that the, larger / longer, error bars for Scotland, the further the calculated mean is (likely to be) to the true mean or shorter / narrower, error bars / confidence limits, with increasing distance (to nearest fish farm) in, Ireland / Scotland, shows the calculated mean is, getting / AW, closer to the true mean; I direct comparison between Ireland with Scotland

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
Infectious diseases, A-Level Biology (syllabus 9700). Structured question, 15 marks.
Source
A-Level Biology, May/June 2023 Paper 5 Variant 1, question 2.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Biology questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep