The cotton bollworms, Helicoverpa armigera (old world bollworm) and Pectinophora gossypiella (pink bollworm), are insect pests of cotton. Adult cotton bollworms are moths. The adult female moths lay eggs on cotton plants. The eggs hatch into larvae. The larvae feed on cotton plants, causing extensive damage and reduction in yield. Fig. 2.1 shows a mature cotton fruit (cotton boll) from an uninfested plant. Fig. 2.2 shows a cotton bollworm inside a developing cotton boll. [Figure 2.1] [Figure 2.2] A gene, cry1Ac, from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), can be inserted into the cotton genome to produce 1 cry gene Bt cotton. • 1 cry gene Bt cotton produces the protein Cry1Ac, which is toxic to some species of bollworm. This toxicity gives cotton plants some resistance to cotton bollworm. An additional gene, cry2Ab, can be inserted into the cotton genome with cry1Ac. This produces 2 cry gene Bt cotton. • 2 cry gene Bt cotton produces two different proteins, both toxic to cotton bollworm.
- (a)(i)A trend is a change over time. Describe three trends shown by the data in Table 2.1.[3]
- (a)(ii)Suggest an explanation for the relationship between growth of Bt cotton and pesticide use on bollworm.[1]
- (b)(i)Predict and explain the effect of resistance on cotton yield, if the planting of Bt cotton continues to increase.[1]
- (b)(ii)Experimental observations have shown that planting rows of non-Bt cotton between rows of Bt cotton slows the spread of resistance. Suggest why this pattern of planting can slow the spread of resistance.[2]
- (c)(i)Identify the independent variable and the dependent variable in this investigation. independent variable dependent variable[2]
- (c)(ii)Suggest one variable that should be standardised in this investigation.[1]
- (c)(iii)Non-Bt cotton plants and Bt cry1Ac cotton plants were included as controls in this investigation. Explain why it is necessary to include these plants in this investigation.[2]
- (c)(iv)The researchers concluded that: 1. The presence of the toxin Vip3AcAa may cause a statistically significant increase in the number of deaths of Bt-resistant larvae. 2. The toxin Vip3AcAa may be equally effective in controlling both types of Bt-resistant larvae. Explain how the data in Table 2.2 support these conclusions.[2]
- (d)Research has shown that the toxin Vip3AcAa is also effective against Bt-resistant types of P. gossypiella (pink bollworm). Suggest a further investigation that could be carried out to find out if Bt cry1Ac + vip3AcAa cotton is more effective than Bt cry1Ac cotton in controlling pink bollworm.[1]
This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.
Mark scheme
Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2020). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.
- [3] (a)(i) any 3 from:
- 1 percentage of Bt cotton has increased (by 72.9/73%);
- 2 (since 2007) the percentage of 1 gene Bt has decreased and 2 or more gene increased ;
- 3 number of hectares of cotton grown has increased (by 0.7 million hectares);
- 4 the use of pesticide has decreased as Bt cotton has increased ;
- 5 AVP;
- [1] (a)(ii) idea of (less insecticide used) as more of the crop is protected from bollworm by the toxic proteins / Cry1Ac / Cry2Ab / AW ;
- [1] (b)(i) idea of the yield will decrease as the population of resistant bollworms will increase ; A in terms of greater selection pressure so only resistant insects survive
- [2] (b)(ii) any 2 from:
- 1 idea of non-Bt cotton enables non-resistant bollworms to survive ;
- 2 idea of breeding between susceptible and resistant bollworms keeps frequency of resistance genes lower (in the gene pool); A in terms of less selection pressure so more susceptible survive to breed
- 3 AVP;
- [2] (c)(i) independent variable: the type of cotton plant/transgenic vip3AcAa / whether the cotton produces Vip3AcAa; dependent variable: the number of dead larvae ;
- [1] (c)(ii) any 1 from:
- 1 number of larvae on each leaf;
- 2 age of larvae ;
- 3 time (after adding larvae / for feeding) before counting dead larvae;
- 4 AVP;
- [2] (c)(iii) any 2 from:
- 1 idea of control using non-Bt plant gives a baseline of larval death caused by factors other than toxic proteins in leaves ;
- 2 idea of control using Bt cry1Ac plants for comparison with non-Bt to show, the larvae are Cry1Ac resistant/no difference in the number that die ;
- 3 AVP;
- [2] (c)(iv)
- 1 difference between the number killed with Bt cry1Ac + vip3AcAa cotton (containing the toxic protein Vip3AcAa) is significant for both types of larvae and (as) standard deviations do not overlap with Bt cry1Ac cotton (which does not contain the toxic protein Vip3AcAa);
- 2 the difference between the increase in deaths of type A larvae and type B larvae killed on Bt cry1Ac + vip3AcAa (compared to those killed on Bt cry1Ac) is not significant and (as) standard deviations overlap ;
- [1] (d) any 1 from:
- 1 idea of carrying out same investigation using susceptible strains of bollworm (as well as resistant types);
- 2 AVP;
Write your answer and get it marked
On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.
Sign up free →