Skip to main content
A-LevelBiologyControl and coordination9700/51 · May/June 2019 · Q121 Marks

A group of six students carried out an experiment to determine their reaction times using a ruler. Fig. 1.1 shows the basic procedure used for the experiment. [Figure 1.1] The students worked in pairs. • Student A rested their hand on a bench. • Student B then dropped a ruler from a set height. • Student A had to catch the ruler as quickly as possible. • The distance the ruler had dropped was measured and recorded. • The students calculated their reaction times. The formula for calculating reaction time in seconds is shown in Fig. 1.2. [Figure 1.2] Table 1.1 shows the results for the six students. [Table 1.1] There was some background noise in the classroom when the students carried out their experiment. The students thought that this noise might have affected their reaction times. They decided to modify their original experiment to find out if the presence or absence of background noise affects reaction time. Fig. 1.3 shows some results for a reaction time test that the students found on the internet. [Figure 1.3] Table 1.2 shows some probability values of t. [Table 1.2] Another student, when carrying out the ruler experiment shown in Fig. 1.1, noticed that the more repetitions carried out, the faster the reaction time became. The student decided to carry out a different experiment to investigate the effect of repetition on the accuracy of carrying out a task. Five students, V, W, X, Y and Z were tested. • Each student was given a picture of a star, as shown in Fig. 1.4. • Each student sat at a desk so that the star was only visible in a mirror, as shown in Fig. 1.5. • Each student was asked to draw between the double lines of the star when looking at it only in the mirror. Fig. 1.6 shows a star diagram completed by a student. • The students recorded the number of times their lines went outside the double line of the star. [Figure 1.4] [Figure 1.5] [Figure 1.6] Each student repeated the task nine times on the same day. The results are shown in Table 1.3. [Table 1.3]

  1. (a)(i)Use the formula in Fig. 1.2 to complete Table 1.1.[1]
  2. (a)(ii)Predict what would happen to the reaction time if the ruler was held higher than the original set height.[1]
  3. (b)(i)Identify the dependent variable in this investigation.[1]
  4. (b)(ii)Using the procedure shown in Fig. 1.1, describe a method that the students could use to find out if the presence or absence of background noise affects reaction time. Your method should be set out in a logical order and be detailed enough for another person to follow.[7]
  5. (c)State why a bar chart is a suitable way to show the data.[1]
  6. (d)(i)Suggest one conclusion the students could have made based on these results.[1]
  7. (d)(ii)The students decided to carry out a t-test to find out if the difference in reaction time was significant. State why a t-test is suitable for these data.[1]
  8. (d)(iii)State a null hypothesis for this test.[1]
  9. (d)(iv)The students used 16 degrees of freedom and calculated t = 2.05. State and explain what the value of t indicates about the difference in mean reaction times shown in Fig. 1.3.[1]
  10. (e)(i)Identify the independent variable in this experiment.[1]
  11. (e)(ii)Suggest the hypothesis that was tested in this experiment.[1]
  12. (e)(iii)A person walked into the room and started talking to one of the students who was carrying out the test. Circle the result in Table 1.3 that was affected by this.[1]
  13. (e)(iv)One of the students had previously carried out a similar task. Identify this student and give a reason for your answer.[1]
  14. (f)State two conclusions based on the data in Table 1.3.[2]

This question uses a diagram from the original paper, which isn't shown here. Open the full paper from the past papers archive to see it.

Mark scheme

Marking points from the official mark scheme (May/June 2019). The mark or mark type is shown in brackets.

  1. [1] 0.13;
  2. [1] (reaction time would be) unchanged; or (reaction time would be) longer / AW;
  3. [1] distance ruler, drops / falls;
  4. [7] any 7 of: 1. test in silence / quiet / AW and noise / AW ; 2. method to ensure silence; 3. ensure consistent / similar / same / known, level / volume / loudness / decibels, of noise / AW; 4. suitable number of people tested; 5. idea of no warning given when ruler to be dropped ; 6. detail of ruler use: same, ruler / starting distance / type or weight of ruler / held vertically; 7. same or similar age / same sex ; 8. use same / dominant, hand ; 9. no, (named) drugs / medications / stimulants / depressants ; 10. idea of avoiding people with conditions affecting reaction time e.g. poor hearing / poor sight / neurological disorders ; 11. same, time of day / stated time; 12. ref. to a minimum of three repeats and calculate a mean; 13. low/medium, risk ;
  5. [1] (independent variable / sound present or absent, is) discontinuous / discrete / qualitative / categoric, variable;
  6. [1] absence of noise (mean) reaction time is longer or presence of noise (mean) reaction time is shorter ;
  7. [1] comparing (two) means / continuous data / normal distribution;
  8. [1] there is no (significant) difference between the (mean) reaction times for no (background) noise and (background) noise ;
  9. [1] not significant / is due to chance (at p > 0.05) and because, it / calculated value / 2.05, is less than, the critical value of t / table value of t / 2.12 ; ora
  10. [1] idea of the (number of), repeats (of the task) / AW ;
  11. [1] idea that as repeats increase, (number of) errors decrease / accuracy increases ;
  12. [1] (student Y, replicate 5) – circle around the number 44 ;
  13. [1] idea of (student) Y and as, had fewer errors / were more accurate (than rest of students); or as (results) start off lower / as (results) are lower in trial one / as even from the very beginning (results) are lower ;
  14. [2] any 2 of: idea that the more, replicates / repeats, carried out, fewer errors are made ; idea of after, 6–7 / several trials, number of errors starts to plateau / number of errors does not continue to decrease ; idea that interruptions / AW, increases number of errors ;

Write your answer and get it marked

On Oracle Prep you can write or photograph your own answer and have it marked by AI against this mark scheme, with feedback on what you missed.

Sign up free →

About this question

Topic
Control and coordination, A-Level Biology (syllabus 9700). Structured question, 21 marks.
Source
A-Level Biology, May/June 2019 Paper 5 Variant 1, question 1.

Questions and mark schemes are from past examination papers and remain the copyright of the exam board. How Oracle Prep builds its content

Related Biology questions

© 2026 Oracle Prep